- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 16, 2007

Professor Robert Friedel waits for the light-bulb moment to strike students in the history-of-technology classes he teaches at the University of Maryland.

No, not the “eureka” moment that describes Thomas Alva Edison’s invention of the light bulb, if such a moment ever happened. The historian in Mr. Friedel disagrees with such oversimplified notions of progress found in some texts and goes to some length to refute them in his latest book, “A Culture of Improvement: Technology and the Western Millennium.”

What he enjoys witnessing is when students are “stunned” by some of the moral ambiguities that a real understanding of history is all about.

How, for instance, “really notable, wonderful people like Oliver Wendell Holmes” can write in praise of eugenics and the need to improve the human race, as Mr. Friedel points out in a chapter titled “The Corruption of Improvement,” which is more or less about the dark side of so-called progress.

The result, he says, is that “you can no longer be smug that you know the best way, or that there is a scientific and technological way to get through every problem … you have to stop and ask about whether there are some moral values that go more deeply than science ones.

“If I can get that reaction, my day is made,” he says.

That chapter gave him the greatest difficulty during the 10 years he spent researching and writing.

“The 20th century has lots of things to be proud of, but in many ways, it is not a pretty picture,” he says. “When I began reading the literature on eugenics, I felt it was deeply important that people see that sometimes you think you are being scientific or rational, but lose sight of something else — the core nature of humanity itself.”

In this way, Mr. Friedel hopes to point out what he calls “an enormous number of prejudices and mythologies” that accompany common perceptions about the role of technology in our lives. Such as the assumption, he says, that “we live in the time of the greatest changes in technology and our lives are being overturned constantly. It is just not supported by the facts. [There were] other periods of time equally short when people’s lives were transformed.”

One of the implicit messages in his book is how what he calls “a culture of improvement” has grown up around this notion and leads people in the West to define themselves as “fundamentally innovative — not content to sit in the present, but always look ahead to the future.” At the same time, he notes, there lurks a sense he identifies as “another belief that we are out of control — that technologies are lurching forward and always threatening to leave our own mentality behind.”

That gets mankind off the hook, he posits: “If technology is going ever faster, then in a sense, we have an excuse if we seem to be screwing things up.”

However, he says, “Results are consequences of human choices, not a technology trajectory.”

The author of previous books, including one on plastics and another on the implications of zipper manufacturing, Mr. Friedel says this one originated with a futile search for an ideal text to use in undergraduate courses. Finding none, he had to write one. The result is a handsomely illustrated 588-page volume published recently by MIT Press that is a broad survey of technology from the 11th century to the present day. The word technology is used in the broadest possible sense because he begins with plows and horses.

“I start with the Middle Ages because I didn’t think we could say where we are now without going that far back,” he says. “With American scholars, and most American writers, you would be fortunate if you get back as far as the 18th century.”

“What I liked was the book didn’t just give a big, linear story about progress onward and upward,” says Merritt Roe Smith, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor of history who also teaches in an interdisciplinary program called Science, Technology and Society.

“There always are times of regress and, in a way, he is warning all readers not to expect the upward thrust to continue forever. That’s much different than what we read in the popular press.”

The book “will surely change the direction” about how [teachers] think about offering such subjects,” he says.

Mr. Friedel’s approach is different in part because of his interest in and emphasis on stories — the human side — to go along with clear explanations of how things work and the social context in which inventions developed.

“When you hear how a bishop wanted to make his churches different — that speaks to me about how we are going to do things differently,” Mr. Friedel says.

“He has synthesized an enormous amount of stuff, and if he stimulates your interest in any particular area, he would be delighted,” says Deborah Warner, curator of the physical sciences collection at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History. Mr. Friedel’s talent, she says, lies in “being able to take something goofy like the zipper and show how that history embodies a whole lot of features we see in the invention of more important things, like the telephone.”

An underlying theme, Mr. Friedel states, is how people respond to novelty and the fact that today we take novelty as routine, a constant. Some of his favorite stories are about people responding to novelty, such as fabled diplomat and inventor Benjamin Franklin in Paris becoming enthralled by hot-air balloons.

Improvement is not to be confused with progress, which, in Mr. Friedel’s mind, often is equated wrongly with technical advances. His own emphasis on process rather than progress has been used before, he admits, but not very effectively. Too many historians of late have taken a narrow approach, he says, and avoided putting matters in a larger framework.

The word “West” and even “Western culture,” he says, refer to “a segment of the human race with a set of shared historical experiences and, to an extent, shared values that seem to describe people within essentially a geographic framework. Sometimes it is not even particularly Western since it may include Japan.”

There are instead what he calls “coherences, some stronger or weaker, boundaries that shift with time.”

Culture as used in his book is best defined, he says, as “a set of beliefs and attitudes we carry with us, typically below the level of consciousness and even of articulation. You could call it the mentality of improvement, but we don’t have a terribly good word for it in English.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide