- The Washington Times - Tuesday, August 7, 2007

President Bush is committed to vetoing the latest effort to expand federal “hate crimes” laws to include sexual orientation, even if it means sending a defense authorization bill back to Congress, the White House said.

“The qualifications [in the bill] are so broad that virtually any crime involving a homosexual individual has potential to have hate crimes elements,” said White House spokesman Tony Fratto.

“The proposals they’re talking about are not sufficiently narrow.”

The veto threat adds another twist to the high-stakes battle between the Democrat-led Congress and Mr. Bush over the Iraq war.

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, attached the crime measure to the defense authorization bill, which Democrats are expected to use as a vehicle to try to alter war policy.

A coalition of religious leaders, many of them black Christian pastors, have lobbied the White House to reject the amendment, saying it could lead to suppression of free speech and religious expression.

“The bill is not about crime prevention or even civil rights. It’s about outlawing peaceful speech — speech that asserts that homosexual behavior is morally wrong,” said Chuck Colson, a former aide to President Nixon who now runs a Christian ministry to prisoners.

The legislation would make it easier for federal law enforcement to become involved in crimes against people based on their “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.”

Bishop Harry Jackson of Hope Christian Church in Lanham is leading the High Impact Leadership Coalition, a group of Christian pastors lobbying against the bill. The coalition is working with Tim Goeglein, deputy director of the White House Office of Public Liaison.

“He seems very receptive,” Mr. Jackson said.

Mr. Kennedy’s office says the bill “punishes violence, not speech.”

“It covers only violent acts that result in death or bodily injury. It does not prohibit or punish speech, expression or association in any way — even hate speech,” said a Kennedy aide.

“Nothing in the act will prohibit the lawful expression of anyone’s religious or political beliefs. People will always be free to speak their mind about issues.”

Mr. Fratto said the president, who has pushed for quick approval of spending for U.S. troops, would send the defense bill back to Capitol Hill if the hate-crime amendment remains attached.

The White House stopped short of saying it was opposed to the language because of concerns about religious freedom.

Mr. Jackson agreed with the White House’s assessment that the measure’s language is too broad. His coalition ran a full-page ad in USA Today last month that said: “Don’t muzzle our pulpits!”

“We believe prosecutors and anti-Christian groups will use loopholes to muzzle the church from speaking out on biblical standards of morality which are shared by most Americans.”

House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn, a South Carolinian who leads the House Democratic Faith Working Group, called that sentiment “grossly inaccurate and highly prejudicial.”

“Absolutely nothing in the [bill] in any way constrains the freedom of expression or religion and I — who was born and raised in the parsonage of a fundamentalist Christian church — believe it is wrong to attempt to defeat civil rights legislation based on such a false claim.”

The House in May passed the hate crimes bill — which the homosexual lobbying group Human Rights Campaign called “historic” — by a vote of 237-180.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide