- The Washington Times - Thursday, February 8, 2007


For the second time, a judge has dismissed a lawsuit against a military contractor that whistleblowers accuse of scamming the U.S. government out of tens of millions of dollars in the first months of the Iraq war.

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III in Alexandria ruled in favor of Fairfax-based Custer Battles LLC, which has been pilloried in Congress and elsewhere as an example of the fraud and mismanagement that plagued the occupation of Iraq under the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA).

Steve Scalise: Countervailing voices in impeachment probe haven't been allowed to come forward
Obama-era cash traced to Iran-backed terrorists
Accused thieves, child-porn suspects, suspected murderers among DACA recipients: Report

Dismissing a lawsuit filed by two whistleblowers, Judge Ellis said there was no evidence that Custer Battles committed fraud while under a $16.8 million contract to provide security at Baghdad International Airport in 2003. The ruling was issued last Friday and made public Tuesday.

The whistleblowers, former Custer Battles employees Robert Isakson and William Baldwin, said the company failed to deliver on promises that it would provide 138 security personnel at the airport.

But Judge Ellis found that Custer Battles never specified how many security personnel it would provide. He said Custer Battles initially provided more than 138 workers and received glowing performance evaluations in its first few months on the job.

The whistleblowers’ attorney, Alan Grayson, said Judge Ellis’ ruling ignored evidence that Custer Battles later diverted airport-security workers to other contracts it obtained from the CPA, and illegally double-billed the government for those employees’ work.

He cited testimony from CPA inspector general Richard Ballard, who said Custer Battles left the airport woefully understaffed, resulting in long lines at checkpoints and, at times, vehicles being waved through checkpoints without inspection.

“The judge never even bothers to mention [the inspector general’s testimony] in his decision,” Mr. Grayson said.

Scott Custer, one of Custer Battles’ founders, issued a statement that he was relieved by the judge’s ruling “but it does not dispel the cloud that hangs over us or erase the two years of legal battles we’ve fought to clear our name.”

Last year, Judge Ellis threw out a separate case against Custer Battles, after a jury awarded a $10 million judgment against the company over its work on a contract to replace the old Iraqi currency. Judge Ellis ruled that any fraud was perpetrated on the CPA rather than the U.S. government, even though the U.S. government ultimately footed the bill.

Mr. Grayson said he will appeal both rulings to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond.

The two cases were initially part of the same lawsuit, which was among the first filed against an Iraq war contractor under the federal False Claims Act. The law allows whistleblowers to bring suits against companies they think are cheating the government, with the whistleblowers getting a percentage of any damages awarded.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide