- The Washington Times - Sunday, March 25, 2007

Buried within a recent presidential-preference poll that asked voters who they would never vote for, an unexpectedly large number gave an emphatic thumbs-down to Democratic front-runner Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York.

A national poll of likely voters by independent pollster John Zogby found nearly half (46 percent) said they couldn’t vote for the former first lady under any circumstances. That is certainly a huge portion of the electorate, which will no doubt feed growing doubts in her party about her electability.

But another number was even more disturbing to senior advisers in her campaign. Mr. Zogby found that among likely Democratic voters, 18 percent said they “would never cast a vote in Mrs. Clinton’s favor.”

That such a large percentage of overall voters would flatly express an aversion to electing her president was troubling enough to top Democratic officials. But that she appeared to be losing support within the base of her own party set off alarm bells among her high command.

The 46 percent of overall voters “includes a significant number of Republicans, conservative-leaning independents, liberal antiwar people who don’t trust her, plus those who don’t like her for a number of reasons, including those who consider her polarizing or feel she can’t win,” Mr. Zogby told me last week.

“If there’s 46 percent who say never, then there are the rest of the voters who can be drawn from. But when I see 33 percent who say they could never vote for Barack Obama or John Edwards, and even Al Gore has less than that, then there is a problem with her and her campaign,” he said.

The 18 percent figure surprised Mr. Zogby. “That is nearly 1 in 5 Democrats. The parties are at parity, which means she’s going to need 85 percent support among Democrats,” he said. Losing 18 percent of the Democrats means she would fall short of the minimum support needed to clinch the presidency.

One Democratic pollster, Ed Sarpolus of Michigan’s EPIC-MRA poll, said, “She’s in a trouble zone. Typically, when a candidate loses more than 12 percent of the base, they tend to lose,” he continued. “If it was 12 percent, I wouldn’t be overly concerned. If it gets around 15 percent, there are enough Democrats who would hold their noses, cover their eyes and vote for Hillary on Election Day.” But beyond that number, should it continue to hold up, “it is very difficult to win,” he said.

However, Mr. Zogby’s poll also showed 19 percent of the Democrats said they could never vote for Mr. Obama, her closest rival for the nomination, or for Mr. Edwards, both of whom are in the top tier.

But Mrs. Clinton’s problems appear to run deeper when you look at a voter and gender breakdown of the 46 percent who would never vote for her. Among men, for example, 51 percent said they would never vote for her, nor, surprisingly, would 42 percent of women,” Mr. Zogby’s March 7-9 poll reported.

None of this means Mrs. Clinton can’t win back some of the doubters, but the pre-primary calendar is growing shorter and she will have to turn things around well before the January-February primaries and caucuses. “It doesn’t mean she can’t turn it around, but she is going to have to do it very quickly. I would say by November because of the number of early primaries and caucuses,” Mr. Sarpolus told me. “Around December, voters attitudes begin to settle in and harden,” he said.

But in an era when presidential campaigns are moving at an ever-faster pace, the early outline of the 2008 election contest is beginning to take shape. Mrs. Clinton retains her party front-runner status, despite her deep polarization of the electorate, while former New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani is leading all of his rivals by increasingly larger margins.

But at this point in the run-up to the two-month primary sprint, virtually all the major general-election-matchup polls show Mr. Giuliani beating Mrs. Clinton. A March 2-5 American Research Group poll shows him ahead of her by 6 points.

Two major factors are in play here. One is the battle between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton and the other is the intensity of opposition to Mrs. Clinton among her party’s antiwar voters. Recent surveys show Mr. Obama closing fast on Mrs. Clinton in the national polls. He trails her by a scant 31 percent to 34 percent in the ARG poll. But nominations are won in state-by-state contests where delegates can be apportioned under different formulas.

In Michigan’s Democratic primary, for example, “Hillary right now is kicking butt,” Mr. Sarpolus told me. But in his latest general-election-matchup survey against either Mr. Giuliani or John McCain, “it’s neck-and-neck.”

All of this says at this juncture that, despite the political woes of war and scandal Republicans have on their plate, the party is still very much alive and kicking in the 2008 race for the presidency.

Donald Lambro, chief political correspondent of The Washington Times, is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide