- The Washington Times - Sunday, May 13, 2007

Education Secretary Margaret Spellings called last week for combating America’s “silent epidemic,” a high-school dropout rate of crisis proportions.

We have long known about the problem, but the numbers are still just as shocking as ever — more so now because of new data showing the real dropout rates have been masked by varying definitions of what constitutes a dropout.

In 1963, President Kennedy addressed the problem when 4 in 10 fifth-graders did not finish high school.

“Forty-four years later, the dropout rate for African-American, Hispanic and Native American students approaches 50 percent. We are wasting not just lives but time,” Mrs. Spellings said in an address to the National Summit on America’s Silent Epidemic, where she and first lady Laura Bush, a former teacher and educators from around the country met to discuss ways to cure a critical illness at the core of America’s school system.

“Despite our best efforts, there are still vast inequities within our education system,” Mrs. Spellings said. “In too many of our cities, the reality faced by minority and low-income kids is shocking. … 15 percent of our high schools produce more than half of our dropouts.”

Nationally, more kids are graduating than ever, but the story is very different in urban, inner-city school districts where public schools sorely lack educational leadership, resources and the political will to overcome a very solvable problem.

In these schools, which Mrs. Spellings says are more appropriately called “dropout factories,” a majority of the students are minorities, and their high-school experience looks vastly different from what most kids encounter.

“They go to schools where trash litters the floors, where graffiti decorates the walls… where most freshmen enter unable to read or do math at an eighth-grade level and where graduation is a 50/50 shot, or worse,” she said. As a result, each year nearly 1 million high-school students do not graduate and thus become virtually unemployable in a knowledge-based economy where even many factory jobs require skills in science, math and technology.

This social epidemic’s deepening dimensions have festered in the shadows for so long because, in many school districts, such dropouts are counted “only if he or she registered as one.” In other districts, dropouts are listed under “graduate” status if they promise to get a diploma at a future time.

But now a new online database showing graduation rates in school districts across the country will give parents the tools to find out how their own communities measure up. Notably, the data produced by the trade journal Education Week show graduation rates lower than previously reported in most states.

How can we turn this tragic situation around? Giving parents data about their schools may help in some areas, but minorities in the poorest school districts may lack access to such data and, in most cases, may not need it to tell them about a dropout rate they may be all too familiar with.

Mrs. Spellings proposes Title I spending in President Bush’s No Child Left Behind reauthorization be increased another $1 billion “to improve and strengthen our public high schools serving low-income students.”

There are legitimate reasons to doubt whether more federal funding will reverse the dropout rate. We’ve been increasing federal aid-to-education budgets for decades now by huge amounts, with little improvement in our SAT scores. This problem ultimately will be solved within the states, communities and the four walls of our classrooms, by outside-the-box thinking about how schools are run, and teachers are hired and how to provide incentives for students to stay in school.

We need to end the prohibition against hiring non-education-degree alternative teachers. Mrs. Spellings called for creating an Adjunct Teacher Corps to bring math and science professionals into the classroom. It’s a good idea. There are great numbers among the soon-to-retire Baby Boom generation in many academic fields who can bring a new and challenging enthusiasm and discipline into our schools.

We need to encourage school-choice programs that allow parents to move their kids out of failing, high-dropout-rate schools into better public, private and parochial schools of their choice. Wisconsin pioneered the school-choice movement with great success. It needs to be copied around the country.

Rather than pour more money into failing schools, why not provide tax-subsidy incentives for major corporations to establish technology and science high schools within inner cities to educate and train the workers they need to remain competitive in the global economy?

Microsoft, IBM and hundreds of other U.S. corporations say they cannot fill thousands of job openings because of a lack of skills in math, science and computer programming.

Such companies would bring the same innovation and excellence to education they have brought to the marketplace. I have a feeling the first Microsoft High School of Science and Technology in, say, the South Bronx, would have few if any dropouts. How about it, Bill Gates?

Donald Lambro, chief political correspondent of The Washington Times, is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide