- The Washington Times - Friday, February 8, 2008

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — Merck & Co. will pay $671 million to settle claims it overcharged the government for four popular drugs and bribed doctors to prescribe its drugs, federal prosecutors said yesterday.

The purported overcharges, dating back to the mid-1990s, involved Medicaid programs in the District of Colombia and every state but Arizona, as well as federal health insurance programs at agencies including the Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs Administration.

A nationwide investigation by federal prosecutors, triggered in 2000 by a former Merck salesman-turned-whistleblower and broadened by a Louisiana doctor who also exposed overcharging, resulted in two settlements announced yesterday.

In Philadelphia, prosecutors said Merck agreed to pay $399 million for improper calculation of Medicaid rebates and bribing doctors.

In New Orleans, prosecutors said the drug maker agreed to pay $250 million for its rebate practices. With interest, that totals $671 million.

“Not only is the combined recovery in these two cases one of the largest health care fraud settlements ever achieved by the Justice Department, it reflects our continuing efforts to hold drug companies accountable for devising pricing schemes” that overcharge the government, said Attorney General Michael D. Mukasey.

White House Station, N.J.-based Merck said the settlements do not constitute an admission of any liability or wrongdoing.

“What we have here is a disagreement [over] the rules of the Medicaid rebate program,” said Merck spokesman Ronald Rogers. “These civil settlements were the best and most appropriate way to resolve these lengthy investigations.”

Drug companies must report to the government the lowest price for their medicines to ensure that Medicaid programs get the same discounts or rebates on drugs they buy. Prosecutors said Merck was hiding steep discounts — up to 92 percent off the average price — it gave hospitals that used a set amount of Merck products.

From 1997 to 2001, prosecutors said Merck had about 15 different programs used by its sales representatives to give doctors and other health professionals “illegal kickbacks,” disguised as fees for training or consultation, to induce them to prescribe Merck drugs.

The Philadelphia case involved pricing programs for the cholesterol drugs Zocor and Mevacor and the painkiller Vioxx, which Merck pulled from the market in September 2004 because Vioxx doubled the risk of heart attack and stroke. Those programs ran from 1996 through 2006, Mr. Rogers said.

The Louisiana case involved pricing for heartburn drug Pepcid, from mid-1996 to April 2001, when it was sold only by prescription.

Federal prosecutors said Merck ended those practices and started a program to comply with government pricing rules in 2001, before learning prosecutors were investigating accusations made in 2000 by former Merck salesman H. Dean Steinke.

Mr. Steinke filed a whistleblower lawsuit in federal court in Philadelphia and notified the U.S. attorney’s office there of his accusations of Merck overcharging the government and giving doctors improper payments, said Virginia Gibson, chief of the office’s civil division.

About four years later, Mr. Steinke filed a similar whistleblower lawsuit in Nevada, where the U.S. attorney’s office there instituted its own probe. Massachusetts, Delaware and Illinois also joined in.

Meanwhile, Dr. William St. John LaCorte, a geriatrics specialist, sued Merck in late 1999 after discovering that some of his patients, while hospitalized, had been switched to Pepcid from other heartburn drugs he prescribed.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide