- The Washington Times - Friday, October 31, 2008
COMMENTARY:

No military operation is riskier than a commando raid. Extreme physical danger and the potentially high payoff if the operation succeeds are two reasons a dramatic raid has box-office appeal in Hollywood.

The U.S. raid last weekend certainly involved immense personal risk by the two-dozen special operations soldiers who entered the Syrian village of Sukkariyeh and shot it out with Abu Ghadiya, believed to be an al Qaeda commander, and his personal cohort. The London Times reported Abu Ghadiya was al Qaeda in Iraq’s “commander for Syrian logistics.”

The raid also entailed political risks. Syria howled, Russia yelped, even Iraq deplored it - but that is surface political rhetoric. For five years, Iraqis have complained of “foreign fighter” and terrorist infiltration from Syria. Baghdad has no sympathy for a beast like Abu Ghadiya, whose “foreign fighters” murdered thousands of Iraqis.

Special operations missions are by necessity covert operations. High-risk missions like gathering intelligence on enemy ground, resupplying allied guerrilla groups and conducting a raid to seize prisoners require secrecy for success. Covert usually means politically deniable - hence the term “shadow warfare” for these special operations and intelligence missions.



The U.S. raid into Syria was a surprise strike, but there was little denial. The U.S. military confirmed the raid.

So did Syrians living in Sukkariyeh in particular, one man who showed a reporter video of U.S. helicopters buzzing his town. He shot the video using his cell phone. New technology has added light and reduced the shadow for special ops.

Sukkariyeh lies close to the Syria-Iraq border. Abu Ghadiyah was in charge of the “rat line” that moved money, weapons, explosives and the “foreign volunteers” through Syria into Iraq.

Supply lines and infiltration routes run by al Qaeda and members of Saddam’s regime have been operating out of Syria since 2004. In 2004, two different people told me that in 2003, after Saddam Hussein’s regime collapsed, several of Saddam’s former Ba’ath Party subordinates received financial support from confederates or sympathizers in Syria. But iron-clad intelligence connecting thugs to financiers was lacking.

The intelligence now available to U.S. and Iraqi forces is much more certain. As a result, the shade for al Qaeda has also diminished.

The “rat lines” in Iraq have been badly damaged. StrategyPage.com recently reported that in the last six months “U.S. and Iraqi forces have shut down most of the smuggling gangs inside Iraq, at least those that specialize in supporting terrorists.”

The Sukkariyeh attack “rolls the rat line up” another notch - a major notch. The London Times quoted an unnamed U.S. official: “As targets present themselves and are identified, they become more and more at risk. Just like in Pakistan, there will be steps taken to deal with it.”

U.S. presidential campaign rhetoric to the contrary, the United States is constantly stalking al Qaeda. We hear about it occasionally, with Air Force gunship strikes in Somalia and CIA-operated Predator unmanned aerial vehicles firing missiles in Pakistan. The Sukkariyeh raid is a more explicit statement that al Qaeda remains in the bull’s-eye.

It has taken a lot of effort to shrink al Qaeda’s shade. People provide the kind of intelligence it takes to make the case for a cross-border raid into an allegedly neutral country.

Again, campaign rhetoric to the contrary, the change in Iraq’s political environment has seeded this improvement in intelligence. Iraq offers a new political choice - democracy - in the Arab Muslim Middle East, a region where choice has been limited to either tyranny or terrorism.

Austin Bay is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide