- The Washington Times - Saturday, April 4, 2009

The Director of National Intelligence and defense secretary are asking the Obama administration to approve a new top-secret spy satellite program that could cost more than $10 billion, according to government, military and industry officials.

The program calls for building two sophisticated satellites equal to or better than the huge, high-resolution secret satellites now in orbit. At the same time, the government would also commit to spending enough money on commercial satellite imagery sufficient to pay for the construction and launch of two new commercial satellites.

The proposal is going to the White House for discussion and a decision was expected as soon as next week, the officials said.

In opting to go with what they describe as the “2+2” program,” Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates rejected an alternate satellite proposal from the Pentagon.

The uniformed military favored developing and launching two new satellites that would be able to observe targets with better resolution than their commercial counterparts. The military maintains its preferred satellites would be faster, cheaper and less technologically difficult to build than the larger satellites envisioned in the proposed “2+2” plan, officials said.

The officials all spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss plans for the highly classified program.

The “2+2” program is meant to avert a potential gap in U.S. imagery satellite coverage around the world. The sophisticated spy satellites now in orbit are nearing the end of their service life, and replacements must be launched in the next decade to prevent blind spots.

The new spy satellites would enter service around 2021, said one government official. Spokesmen for the office of the Director of National Intelligence and the CIA would not comment on the classified plan.

The “2+2” proposal has already drawn fire from Missouri Sen. Christopher S. Bond, the top Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee. Mr. Bond has been pushing the intelligence agency to build an experimental system that would provide nearly the same quality imagery at a lower cost.

Industry and government officials said both systems could deliver similarly detailed photos, but the larger “2+2” system could deliver them from more distant orbits than the smaller satellites proposed by the military.

The satellites in use now by the government tend to be high-altitude, expensive units that provide the finely detailed imagery required by intelligence and military officials. The new system backed by Mr. Bond and military officials would rely on a new class of more numerous, less expensive, lower-orbiting satellites, but their track record is not yet proven.

A joint CIA-National Reconnaissance Office report endorsed the use of smaller, close-orbiting satellites, according to a letter Mr. Bond wrote to Mr. Blair on March 16.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide