- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 27, 2009


America’s fiscal and economic outlook is looking a lot bleaker under President Obama’s impotent and misguided spending stimulus policies.

While there are fragile signs the recession appears to be bottoming out and making a tenuous comeback in parts of the economy, the painfully slow turnaround has had little to do with the Democrats’ huge $800 billion spending binge that hasn’t made a dent in the nation’s unemployment rate.

Indeed, the White House announced this week that the jobless rate will climb next year and remain high the year after that in the face of record budget deficits and a tripling of the government’s public debt.

White House projections in its midsession fiscal review tell the story.

The government’s annual budget deficit has never hit $500 billion, but under Mr. Obama’s spending policies it will sail at more than $1.5 trillion this year, a quarter of a trillion dollars more than the administration estimated in May.

Under its latest projections, the deficit will remain at $1.5 trillion in 2010, falling to $1.12 trillion in 2011 and then down to $800 billion in 2012. If the new numbers are anything like their previous estimates, we can expect them to turn out much higher than projected. All this means massively higher public debt that stood at $5.8 trillion at the end of fiscal 2008 but that will nearly triple in 10 years to $17.5 trillion.

But don’t expect this added spending to stimulate the economy anytime soon. On the contrary, the administration expects unemployment to remain in the higher ranges for the next several years, at least.

The White House originally projected the economy, as measured in the gross domestic product, would shrink by 1.2 percent this year, but now expects GDP to decline by 2.8 percent, while independent analysts say the contraction could be deeper than that.

The administration isn’t any better in its unemployment projections that were more than a little rosy earlier this year. It projected the jobless rate at 8.1 percent this year, falling to 7.9 percent in 2010 and 7.1 percent in 2011.

This week’s annual unemployment projections: 9.3 percent this year, 9.8 percent in 2010 and 8.6 percent in 2011. Many outside analysts say unemployment will hit 10 percent next year and decline very slowly after.

Little wonder that a USA Today/Gallup Poll found earlier this month that 57 percent of the American people they surveyed believe Mr. Obama’s stimulus package has had no impact on the economy or has made things worse. Sixty percent doubted it would have much if any effect in the years to come.

Mr. Obama’s broader anti-capitalism, anti-investment policies — i.e., higher tax rates and clamping down on trade and increased energy production — will only make things worse, economists say.

“In one of its most intrusive expansions, Washington has become the nation’s allocator of capital, setting detailed capital requirements and accounting rules in ways that channel credit to favored states, industries and uses. Small businesses and consumers are bearing the brunt of this credit market shift,” writes Wall Street economist David Malpass in this week’s Forbes magazine.

“A good jobs and investment environment depends on a strong and stable currency, restrained federal spending, less harmful legislation, dependable contract law, limits on taxation and countercyclical capital regulation,” Mr. Malpass says.

“On most points the Bush administration went the other way: It spent heavily and encouraged market volatility,” Mr. Malpass adds. “Instead of reversing these mistakes, the Obama administration has maintained most Bush policies, while adding tax risks and even more spending.”

From the Federal Reserve Board to Wall Street, there is the growing expectation that the recovery, when it comes, will be slow and anemic.

Mr. Malpass, too, sees “a weak recovery,” as a result of a weak dollar and capital flight to seek better returns abroad, “even as we systematically increase our own cost of capital with tax increases, volatility and the erosion of contract law.”

Democrats, too, are calling on the administration to change its policy on trade to open up foreign markets to U.S. goods and services as a key part of its recovery policies.

“The current economic downturn and the need to create jobs make reflexive anti-trade sentiments more foolhardy than ever. Recent export growth has been one of the few bright spots amid the deluge of bad news from businesses across the spectrum, and efforts to give innovative new American businesses access to foreign markets should be at the top of any comprehensive agenda to pull the nation out of recession,” writes global economic analyst Ed Gresser at the Democratic Leadership Council.

Mr. Gresser’s proposals for a new trade agenda: The administration needs to push stalled free trade agreements with Panama, Korea and Columbia, cut import tariffs, and reopen negotiations with our major trading partners on agricultural exports.

Meantime, the bleak numbers coming out of the White House mean that the economy is in for a slow, mediocre recovery that suggests Democratic losses in next year’s midterm elections.

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide