- The Washington Times - Thursday, December 3, 2009

BALTIMORE | Mayor Sheila Dixon’s misdemeanor fraud conviction fails to meet a key standard necessary for her removal from office, her attorney said Wednesday as the mayor resumed her regular duties a day after the verdict.

Her criminal defense lawyer, Arnold M. Weiner, said the guilty verdict reflected testimony about actions that weren’t part of Ms. Dixon’s duties as City Council president, the post she held at the time.

State law requires removal of elected officials who are convicted of crimes related to their public duties and responsibilities.

A legal expert, however, said the argument that the conviction didn’t pertain to her public responsibilities would be weak.

It’s not clear whether her defense team would have an opportunity to argue that point before a suspension takes effect, or whether such a claim would be decided by the trial judge or another court.

Her defense team plans to appeal the conviction.

Meanwhile, former mayor and fellow Democrat Kurt L. Schmoke said Ms. Dixon owes her constituents an apology if she plans to fight for her job.

“The city has been put through a very traumatic situation. She should apologize for having placed the city in this situation and maybe ask the city for forgiveness,” said Mr. Schmoke, who served as Baltimore’s mayor from 1987 to 1999 and is now dean of Howard University’s law school in Washington.

Ms. Dixon’s conviction of fraudulent misappropriation by a fiduciary of $525 worth of gift cards carries a penalty ranging from unsupervised probation to five years in prison. Her sentencing hasn’t been scheduled. The jury acquitted her on three other counts, including felony theft, and failed to reach a verdict on a second count of misappropriation.

Under state law, Ms. Dixon must be suspended upon sentencing for a conviction that’s related to her public duties and responsibilities and involves moral turpitude. She would be removed permanently and replaced by the City Council president if she loses all appeals.

Byron L. Warnken, associate professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, said Maryland case law has determined that fraudulent misappropriation is a crime of moral turpitude. He said any argument that Ms. Dixon’s conviction wasn’t related to her public duties would be weak, but a stronger case could made that she can’t be removed as mayor for an offense that she committed before attaining that office.

” ‘It’s a moot point because I’m finished being City Council president’ - I think that’s an argument,” said Mr. Warnken, an experienced appellate and criminal defense lawyer.

Meanwhile, mayoral spokesman Scott Peterson said Ms. Dixon’s focus “is on the city and the citizens of the city.”

He said Ms. Dixon conducted a senior staff meeting Wednesday morning and had lunch with the city’s public schools chief.

Later in the afternoon, she joked about the media attention at an event at a police precinct where a community group donated $5,000 to the department’s mounted unit.

“Well, it’s really great to be here and it’s great that you brought out all the media for this event. I’m impressed,” the mayor said, acknowledging the half-dozen television cameras before her.

Ms. Dixon said she wouldn’t comment as reporters shouted questions about whether she would step down.

c Associated Press Writers Alex Dominguez and Ben Greene contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide