- The Washington Times - Sunday, January 18, 2009



With all the preparations for the biggest, most expensive and most restrictive Inaugural celebration in history, this is probably not the time to remind our president-elect of things he said and wrote, promises made or commitments pledged. Perhaps one of his new aides will clip and save this for his perusal later next week.

Candidate Barack Obama repeatedly described Afghanistan as “the central front in the war on terror.” Sometimes, he included neighboring Pakistan, which he occasionally threatened to attack. After a brief visit to Afghanistan in July 2008, he said, “One of the biggest mistakes we’ve made strategically” was “failing to finish the job.” He used a sports metaphor, “we took our eye off the ball,” to accuse his predecessor of being “distracted by Iraq.” Then he pledged that if elected, “I will once and for all dismantle al Qaeda and the Taliban.” That is what we were told by once senator, now president-elect, soon to be commander in chief, Barack Obama. But that’s not what he is saying today.

Last week, he announced that despite 61 released detainees returning to commit more atrocities, the Guantanamo Bay detention facility will be closed - likely making it official in his Inaugural address. He authorized his secretary of state-designate to testify in congressional hearings that he will soon be “engaging with Iran.”

Though Mr. Obama has given the nod to deploying 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, his soon-to-be vice president, standing in Kandahar last week, spoke nothing of victory. Instead, Sen. Joseph Biden said just that he was “very interested in what becomes of this region, because it affects us all.”

All this demonstrates a frightening naivete about who our adversaries are, what is at stake, and what to do about it. After Tuesday, the ball is in Mr. Obama’s court - and in the hands of a new set of advisers - some of whom I have known well for decades. Hopefully, they will be willing to apprise our new chief executive of some hard realities.

First, we’re not at war against “the Taliban” or “al-Qaeda” or Jemiah Islamiah or Hamas or Hezbollah - or any other “group” - no matter what its trade name. Our fight is against radical Islam that declared an unprovoked war against us - just like the ideological struggle we waged against fascism and communism. The “central front” of this war may be on the Indo-Pakistani border today, but it could be in Somalia next month. It began in the 1980s when Islamic radicals began blowing themselves up to kill Europeans, Pro-Western Muslims, Israelis and Americans. We just didn’t fight back until more than 3,000 of us were killed by Islamic radicals on Sept. 11, 2001.

From October 2001 until March 2003, Afghanistan was “the central front.” From then, until late 2007, the battle was waged primarily in Iraq. The goal - no matter how poorly articulated - was to prevent radical Islamists from using Mesopotamia as a haven for acquiring weapons of mass destruction and to fight them “over there” instead of here. It took longer and was more expensive in lives and treasure than anyone wanted, but it worked.

Today, the campaign against radical Islam in Iraq is won. In countless battles, young Americans in flak jackets and helmets defeated often-suicidal enemies, built schools and clinics, established civil order and trained and equipped a new ally in a part of the world where we need friends. Americans became the protectors of Muslim women and assured their rights to participate fully in the economic, social and political life of a country. That’s a major victory in the fight against radical Islam.

Hopefully, at some point in the not-too-distant future the new commander in chief will acknowledge his predecessor’s resolve - and thank the soldiers, sailors, airmen Guardsmen and Marines who achieved it.

Instead of expressing “interest” in what happens in the shadow of the Hindu Kush, the new administration needs to realize failure is not an option. Despite significant cultural and tribal differences between Afghanistan and Iraq - they are equally “winnable” if we do the right things, such as the following.

- Use the presidential bully pulpit to remind Afghanistan’s neighbors that if Taliban/terror bases on their territories are not closed, they will be attacked.

- Commence building paved roads throughout all of Afghanistan’s 34 provinces to generate jobs, reduce casualties from improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and mines, and show the Afghan people their government cares about them.

- Stop corruption and illicit drug production from the top down, not the bottom up. Arrest and prosecute the kingpins, and then go for eradication and crop replacement. It worked in Colombia, and it can work in Afghanistan.

- Shut down the NATO-ISAF command structure in Kabul. “Allied” forces that can’t or won’t fight should be thanked and sent home. Then, replicate the effective and successful counterinsurgency strategy Gen. David Petraeus devised for Iraq.

And finally, a solution to relocating the violent enemy combatants in “Gitmo” is to pick up the detainees, the guards and support personnel in Cuba and bring them to the brand-new, as yet unoccupied, 1,600-bed “super-max” Thomson Correction Facility - in Illinois. They can keep Gov. Rod Blagojevich company.

Oliver North is a nationally syndicated columnist, the host of “War Stories” on the Fox News Channel, the author of “American Heroes” and the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide