- The Washington Times - Monday, June 15, 2009

Joan Pryor
Family: Husband
Date of purchase: N/A
Percent of portfolio that were GM bonds at purchase: “A significant portion.”
Percent of portfolio now: N/A
Reason for purchase: Safe investment for a retirement income
Reason for holding after downgraded to junk status in 2005: Was told to wait it out
Original investment goal: Retirement income

Six years ago, Joan Pryor and her husband bought GM bonds for their retirement. Neither had a pension, and they felt they needed more retirement income than Social Security could provide.

“I’m worried, very worried. I have to figure out how to earn more income,” Mrs. Pryor said. “We’ve had to cut back on charitable donations, which is hard, and we don’t want to.”

Mrs. Pryor said she has had to shop for cheaper phone and cable TV arrangements.

“We’re not concerned with building a nest egg anymore,” she said. “We’re trying to use the nest egg to live on,” and that amount has been shrinking because of GM’s problems.

Mrs. Pryor said she thought bondholders held a privileged place among debtors during a bankruptcy. “A lot of people told us to hang on to the bonds,” she said.

She said the terms of this bankruptcy do not make her feel privileged at all, and she is no Wall Street titan.

“Being portrayed as greedy is so off base it just doesn’t make any sense,” Mrs. Pryor said. “It isn’t greedy to ask for equal treatment.”

Click here to view vignettes of seven other GM bondholders.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide