- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 5, 2010


The proponents of homosexual marriage want to redefine the meaning of a word that has been in common use for centuries (“Judge’s ruling gives boost to same-sex marriage,” Page 1, Thursday).

This smacks of George Orwell’s “1984.” Do the proponents of legalized homosexual unions really think governmentsshould have the power to change the meaning of common words? On the other hand, opponents of same-sex marriage seem to be saying that governments should be able to determine which sexes may live together and then dole out rights and privileges on the basis of that determination.

It seems to me both sides in this controversy need to step back and take a hard look at the implied side effects of what they are promoting - and then try to find a sensible compromise.


Vienna, Va.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide