- The Washington Times - Monday, December 13, 2010


In the spirit of the Christmas season, let me highlight from last week’s confusing Washington rhetoric a statement by President Obama that was shrewd - even wise. In the spirit of compromise, he pointed out that even though under the Constitution’s original compromise, he (implicitly, as a black man) “could not have walked through the front door” - the compromise was worth it because otherwise, we would not have gained a union.

Of course, throughout history, calling for compromise may sometimes be a cover for sheer cynicism and lack of principle. Yet without the capacity to compromise at more or less the right moment, collective activity - such as self-government - is impossible.

I have been a convinced conservative for almost a half a century of political activism - since I was 13 years old. And over that time, I have learned of the need to compromise. As a White House staffer for Ronald Reagan for six years, I had a chance to observe close up a principled conservative practice the art of compromise with rare excellence. I confess that at the time, as a new arrival to Washington, I often argued against the compromises. I was always concerned that we were about to sell out the principles we had come to Washington to vindicate.

But over time, it became obvious to me - and virtually all my fellow compromise skeptics - that President Reagan was right and we were wrong. He had seen enough of life to understand the difference between a debate - and getting something needed done.

And, importantly, he was so closely tethered to his convictions that he understood when to stand firm - as he did in negotiations with the Soviets when he refused to give up our “star wars” strategic-missile-defense research and deployment.

There are many changing mental aspects to getting older - not all of them good - but experience usefully reveals the sheer impossibility of imposing all of one’s views on a conflicted world. Even totalitarian dictators eventually fail at such efforts.

If you are lucky, experience also teaches you to look through the surface of things to their inherent utility or disutility. For example, consider the legislative process. Viewed on the surface - politician by politician, individual motive by individual motive - all legislative efforts are squalid affairs. But legislating is potentially raised above such squalor - even to the level of nobility - by the fact that the politicians are elected by the people and their horrid process is necessary for self-government.

And so far, the three geniuses of America have been our love for liberty, our optimistic insistence on success and, thus, our capacity for timely, principled compromise. The one great failure to compromise in American history was, of course, in the 1850s, when we failed to solve the question of what to do about slavery expanding into the new territories. Six hundred thousand Americans died as a result in the War Between the States - although I concede that perhaps on that issue, honorable compromise was impossible. But for our congressmen and the public, our reasons not to be open to compromise had better always be of such stark moral dimensions as human slavery or liberty. On most matters, honorable, principled compromise is possible.

At this moment in Washington, too many of our Washington politicians sound like - in Cyril Connolly’s words - “jackals snarling over a dried well.”

Starting immediately, it is beyond the doubt of rational minds of the right, center or left - (yes, I concede to my fellow conservatives that I am stretching a point combining the words “rational” and “the left”) - that our national destiny requires us to re-establish fiscal balance or let our great history and remaining great destiny rot and fail.

As Alan Greenspan observed recently, we will surely reduce our debt and deficit - “the only question is whether we do it before or after a bond crisis.” And, as we have seen in Greece, Ireland and other parts of the world, a bond crisis doesn’t come slowly. It strikes within hours when the collective judgment of cold and calculating investor minds around the world reach a harsh judgment.

How ludicrous our petty haggling will look to us the morning after. And what a painful and long-lasting economic agony we and the world economy will have if that dreadful day comes.

But as Thomas Paine said and Reagan often repeated, “We have it in our power to begin the world over again.” And we do. Congress and the president could start now - before Christmas - to begin signaling to the world that Washington is committed to laying the legislative foundations in the next six months for fixing our fiscal crisis. It’s not even a world we have to begin again - just a vaunted American skill we have to reapply.

Tony Blankley is the author of “American Grit: What It Will Take to Survive and Win in the 21st Century” (Regnery, 2009) and vice president of the Edelman public relations firm in Washington.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide