- The Washington Times - Wednesday, February 10, 2010

It has escalated into a family feud with little chance of detente: The sons of former President Ronald Reagan are squabbling over the intellectual legacy of their father.

Would Reagan have approved of the “tea party,” with its professed love of liberty, low taxes and small government? And what would he have thought of Sarah Palin?

Liberal commentator Ron Reagan and his older half brother, Michael Reagan, who is a conservative talk-radio host, cannot agree on it.

During a recent appearance on a CNN talk show, Ron Reagan suggested that the Gipper might have looked askance at the tea party movement, which began almost a year ago during a series of spirited anti-tax rallies in several cities.

“Oh, I think he would be unamused by the tea partiers, with their Hitler signs and all the rest of it,” Ron Reagan told host Joy Behar. “No, I don’t think he’d be cottoning to that much at all.”

He added that the Republican Party itself was a “true train wreck,” citing Mrs. Palin and Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts as examples of the party’s demise.

“She doesn’t have a thought in her head,” Ron Reagan said of the former Alaska governor.

“I strongly disagree with my brother, Ron Reagan’s assertions that our father, President Ronald W. Reagan, would not support the tea party movement in this country and Sarah Palin’s activism, if he were alive today,” countered Michael Reagan on Wednesday.

“President Reagan championed freedom throughout the world. He believed in the power of the people. His fundamental core beliefs about individual freedoms and liberties, and against government intrusion into the lives of citizens, were foremost on his agenda, he continued.

“I believe he would embrace the tea party movement if he were alive today and support the work of Sarah Palin, Scott Brown and others who espouse conservative principles, who are opening up the eyes of the public to what is happening to our nation,” Michael Reagan said.

He cited the “involvement” of the tea party in steering the political discourse about heath-care reform and lauded the grass-roots appeal of Mrs. Palin and the tenacity of Mr. Brown in winning the seat long held by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, considered a Democratic bulwark for decades.

“There’s no doubt that President Reagan would respect the power and political potency of this movement,” Michael Reagan said.

The sibling rivalry has created its own cultural moment, sparking the inevitable caterwaul among other commentators and pundits who now have plenty to work with.

The video footage of Ron Reagan’s original comments on CNN have since been isolated on YouTube, along with his subsequent on-camera arguments over tea parties with conservative blogger Pamela Geller.

Ron Reagan’s appearance “is a circus of liberal immaturity,” observed Tara Lynn Thompson, a blogger with Rightpundit.com, who posted the footage.

“More moronic Republican women speak out,” wrote Harmon Leon, a contributor to True/Slant.com, a Forbes Media blog that bills itself as a forum for the “entrepreneurial journalist.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide