- The Washington Times - Friday, September 3, 2010


Most commentators offering opinions on Middle East peace assure us that the Palestinians want a peaceful two-state solution (“Obama opens talks on Mideast peace,” Web, News, Wednesday). But just what Palestinians are they talking about? Those in Hamas-controlled Gaza who make no secret of their desire to destroy Israel, or Israel’s interlocutors in the West Bank who refuse to include Israel on maps of the region because they consider Israel illegitimate?

No one suggests a solution to the existential problem of Hezbollah-controlled southern Lebanon, as if the threat will disappear if we refuse to acknowledge its existence. Let’s not forget that Israel withdrew voluntarily from both southern Lebanon and Gaza only to see irredentist anti-Semites move in and provoke armed confrontations. The same possibility must be considered with the West Bank.

As long as these threats to Israel remain, even an agreement with the Palestinian Authority for a truncated West Bank state will be nothing more than a feel-good measure doomed to fail.



Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide