- The Washington Times - Wednesday, June 15, 2011


The wind-power industry celebrated Global Wind Day on Wednesday, an occasion promoted by the wind-lobby group American Wind Energy Association to tout the benefits of wind power. The same group is also pushing to create a “WindMade” certification to identify products made using this energy source.

In principle, there are grounds to celebrate the evolution of wind power into a robust and sustainable element of the world’s energy portfolio, but we need to take off the blinders and look at wind from all sides. When we do, we see a very significant, dark cloud that hangs over what otherwise could be an unabashed celebration of a potentially green power source - the toll that wind turbines exact on bird and bat populations.

In 2009, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimated that about 440,000 birds were killed each year by the fast-spinning wind turbines - and that was when the industry was just beginning an expansion that may bring about a twelvefold growth by 2030. It is impossible to determine how many dead birds that will translate into (it depends how and where wind projects are built) but without a sea change in the industry, it certainly will be in the millions.

And it’s not just any birds that are killed. Many iconic American birds have died in encounters with whirling turbine blades: eagles, hawks, kestrels, owls and many songbird species. So the next time you hear someone say, “Cats kill more birds than wind turbines,” remember that cats don’t kill golden eagles. Wind power does something else, too: Like other forms of development, it destroys bird habitat. In the West, where significant wind power build-out is planned, habitat for the once-common but now increasingly rare prairie chicken and sage grouse is particularly threatened.

But it doesn’t have to be this way. Wind energy can coexist with birds, but not on the path we’re currently taking. The wind industry will proudly hold up a few wind developments as proof of how it is doing the right thing for birds. But don’t be fooled: For every one project that is done right, many are being done very wrong - poorly sited in places important for birds or along migratory pathways - with no planning and with little done to make up for the damage caused.

We cannot expect giant utility conglomerates to do the right thing on their own. In an era when the phrase “government regulation” is viewed by many as dirty words, we need to acknowledge that this is one case in which additional, mandatory federal standards are essential for the future of our birds and their habitats. The proposed federal wind-industry guidelines are not mandatory - they are optional. Other energy sectors, such as coal, oil, gas and nuclear, don’t get to choose which environmental standards they abide by. Why should wind?

The wind industry wants the WindMade moniker to suggest that wind energy is somehow in harmony with the environment, with nature - and it could be. If the wind industry would take responsibility for bird-mortality issues and provide the requisite simple fixes, that would go a long way toward bringing that green imagery into focus for all of us.

George Fenwick is president of the American Bird Conservancy.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide