- Associated Press - Thursday, June 23, 2011

AMSTERDAM — A Dutch court acquitted populist politician Geert Wilders of hate speech and discrimination Thursday, ruling that his anti-Islam statements, while offensive to many Muslims, fell within the bounds of legitimate political debate.

Presiding Judge Marcel van Oosten said Mr. Wilders‘ claims that Islam is violent by nature and his calls to halt Muslim immigration and ban the Muslim holy book, the Koran, must be seen in a wider context of debate over immigration policy.

The court said his public statements could not be directly linked to increased discrimination against Dutch Muslims.

Mr. Wilders sat stone-faced while the judge read the ruling, but smiled broadly and shook hands with his lawyers after the verdict was announced. He waved to cheering supporters who hugged each other in the public gallery, and grinned as he left the courtroom.

Mr. Wilders, one of the most powerful and popular politicians in the Netherlands, was accused of inciting hatred and discrimination against Muslims through numerous public statements, and with insulting them by comparing Islam with Naziism.

“I’m incredibly happy with this acquittal on all counts,” Mr. Wilders said outside the courtroom.

“It’s not only an acquittal for me, but a victory for freedom of expression in the Netherlands. Fortunately, you’re allowed to discuss Islam in public debate and you’re not muzzled. … An enormous burden has fallen from my shoulders,” he said.

Groups that filed the complaints against Mr. Wilders that ultimately led to his prosecution said they were disappointed with the ruling.

Lawyer Ties Prakken, who represented some complainants, was quoted by local media as saying Dutch courts are failing to protect a religious minority from discrimination.

With legal avenues in the Netherlands exhausted, Ms. Prakken said she’s preparing an appeal to the U.N. Commission on Human Rights in Geneva.

The court found that Mr. Wilders‘ rhetoric was at times on the edge of what is legally permissible.

The judge described his statements about a “tsunami” of immigrants overrunning the country and threatening its culture as “crude and denigrating,” but legally legitimate given the wider context and his further statements that he has no objections to Muslims who integrate and accept Dutch values.

Mr. Wilders, who lives under constant protection due to death threats, has never called for violence or endorsed it.

In speeches and written articles, Mr. Wilders said Islam is an inherently violent religion, and he compared the Koran with “Mein Kampf,” Hitler’s tirade against Jews - an especially touchy image because of the large number of Dutch Jews handed over to the Nazis in World War II.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide