- Associated Press - Wednesday, March 16, 2011

LAHORE, Pakistan (AP) — A CIA contractor who shot and killed two Pakistani men was freed from prison on Wednesday after the United States paid $2.34 million in “blood money” to the victims’ families, Pakistani officials said, defusing a dispute that had strained ties between Washington and Islamabad.

In what appeared to be a carefully choreographed end to the diplomatic crisis, the U.S. Embassy said the Justice Department had opened an investigation into the killings on Jan. 27 by Raymond Allen Davis. It thanked the families for “their generosity” in pardoning Mr. Davis but did not mention any money changing hands.

Mr. Davis left the country immediately on a U.S. flight, Pakistani and American officials said.

Rebecca Davis, Mr. Davis‘ wife, said she was elated when she learned of her husband’s release in a phone call at 6:30 a.m. She said she doesn’t know where the money paid to release her husband came from.

“I knew it was self-defense. My husband is not a killer; he’s not a Rambo,” she said, speaking outside her home in Highlands Ranch, Colo.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, speaking from Cairo, thanked Pakistan and the families of the two men for allowing Mr. Davis to go free. She called the two Pakistani men who were shot “victims.”

Mrs. Clinton said the United States did not pay to win Mr. Davis‘ release, but she didn’t dispute that the men’s families were compensated. The amount and source of money paid to the families is not yet completely clear.

The killings and detention of Mr. Davis triggered a fresh wave of anti-American sentiment in Pakistan and were testing an alliance seen as key to defeating al Qaeda and ending the war in Afghanistan.

Antagonism was especially sharp between the CIA and Pakistan‘s powerful Inter Services Intelligence, which said it did not know Mr. Davis was operating in the country. One ISI official said the agency had backed the “blood money” deal as way of soothing tensions.

Small groups of protesters took to the street in major cities after nightfall, briefly clashing with police outside the U.S. Consulate in Lahore, where officers fired tear gas at men burning tires and hurling rocks. Some called for larger protests Friday after noon prayers.

Mr. Davis, a 36-year-old Virginia native, claimed he acted in self-defense when he killed the two men on the street in the eastern city of Lahore. The United States initially described him as either a U.S. consular or embassy official, but officials later acknowledged he was working for the CIA, confirming suspicions that had aired in the Pakistani media.

The United States insisted Mr. Davis was covered by diplomatic immunity, but the weak government here, facing intense pressure from Islamist parties, sections of the media and the general public, did not say whether this was the case.

The payment of “blood money,” sanctioned under Pakistani law, was suggested as the best way to end the dispute.

Given the high stakes for both nations, few imagined either side would allow it to derail the relationship. The main question was how long it would take to reach a deal.

Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah said Mr. Davis was charged with murder Wednesday in a court that was convened in a prison in Lahore but immediately was pardoned by the families of the victims after the payment.

Reporters were not allowed to witness the proceedings.

“This all happened in court, and everything was according to law,” he said. “The court has acquitted Raymond Davis. Now he can go anywhere.”

Raja Muhammad Irshad, a laywer for the families, said 19 male and female relatives appeared in court to accept the $2.34 million. One Pakistani official said the sum was just under twice that, while other media outlets reported the amount was between $700,000 and $1.4 milion.

He said each told the court “they were ready to accept the ‘blood money’ deal without pressure and would have no objection if the court acquitted Raymond Davis.”

Representatives of the families previously had said they would refuse any money.

Asad Mansoor Butt, who previously represented the families, accused Pakistan‘s government of pressuring his former clients; he gave no details.

Some media reports said the some of the families had been given permission to live in the United States.

Mr. Irshad said that was not discussed in court.

The case dominated headlines and television shows in Pakistan, with pundits using it to whip up hatred against the already unpopular United States. While the case played out in court, many analysts said that the dispute was essentially one between the CIA and the ISA and that they would need to resolve their differences before Mr. Davis could be freed.

One ISI official said CIA Eirector Leon E. Panetta and Gen. Shuja Pasha, the CIA chief, talked in mid-February to smooth out the friction between the two spy agencies. A U.S. official confirmed that the phone call took place.

Gen. Pasha demanded that the United States identify “all the Ray Davises working in Pakistan, behind our backs,” the official said.

He said Mr. Panetta agreed “in principle” to declare such employees, the official said, but would not confirm if the agency had done so.

A second ISI official said that as a result of that conversation the ISI — which along with the army is a major power center in the country — then backed an effort to help negotiate the “blood money.” The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not allowed to give their names to the media.

CIA spokesman George Little said the two agencies had had “a strong relationship for years.”

“When issues arise, it is our standing practice to work through them. That’s the sign of a healthy partnership, one that is vital to both countries, especially as we face a common set of terrorist enemies,” he said.

Associated Press writers Kimberly Dozier in Kabul, Afghanistan; Munir Ahmed and Zarar Khan in Islamabad, Pakistan; Adam Goldman in Washington; and Dan Elliott in Colorado contributed to this report.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide