- The Washington Times - Monday, August 20, 2012

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Either Washington Times reporter Seth McLaughlin, who wrote “Vet of 1990s welfare shift faults both sides in clash” (Web, Wednesday) is a closet liberal, or he is poorly informed about the political leanings of various think tanks around Washington. Otherwise, he would not have presented the views of a representative of the Brookings Institution (Ron Haskins) as unbiased comments on the dispute between the Democrats and Republicans on the president’s rewriting of the welfare reform law.

As anyone who has been here in Washington even a few months knows, the Brookings Institution is essentially an arm of the Democratic Party, and while they try to maintain a facade of objectivity, they almost invariably back the Democratic position. So it is no wonder Mr. Haskins gave the impression that the Republicans are as much at fault as the Democrats. If Mr. McLaughlin wanted to do an honest article on the subject he should have gone to the Heritage Foundation in addition to or instead of the Brookings Institution.

HENRY BORGER

Laurel, Md.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide