- The Washington Times - Friday, June 15, 2012


We have seen Rep. Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, editorialize too many times on his bill for mandatory E-Verify as a way of controlling the hiring of illegal aliens (“E-Verify helps minorities,” Commentary, Wednesday).

Yes, mandatory E-Verify would help address the problem if it were more widely enforced. But in his column, Mr. Smith fails to explain that his bill also contains Section 6, the pre-emption clause that would nullify all existing and future state and local laws addressing the hiring of illegal aliens. Mr. Smith has steadfastly refused to remove this section. The only controls on illegal immigration to date have been the state and local laws in places including Arizona, Alabama and elsewhere. The federal government refuses to enforce its laws - even more so now, under President Obama and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.

Mr. Smith and his Chamber of Commerce helpers surely know that while this bill looks like a politically appealing step toward illegal-immigration enforcement, the feds will never enforce it and the states subsequently will be prohibited from acting on it.

Unfortunately, it looks good but smells bad. If Mr. Smith is serious about E-Verify, he should drop the pre-emption clause.



Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide