- The Washington Times - Tuesday, June 4, 2013


There is simply no truth to Tony Sayegh’s analysis of debit-card swipe-fee reform (“Three years of Dodd-Frank’s broken promises,” Commentary, May 31).

Just last week, the Federal Reserve said that, since the Durbin Amendment, small banks exempt from debit-card reform have collected higher debit fees than big banks. In fact, debit fees per transaction for exempt banks are the same as they were before debit reform. This echoes earlier findings from the Government Accountability Office and Federal Trade Commission, as well as prior Federal Reserve studies.

When it comes to checking-account fees, the data shows there is no relationship to swipe fees. Swipe fees tripling over the past decade didn’t result in consumer checking fees getting cut by a similar amount. In fact, Bankrate.com surveys show just the opposite, with swipe fees and checking-account fees increasing in tandem for six years in a row.

Since the passage of the Durbin Amendment, data collected by moneyrates.com shows that big banks (the only ones affected by the new limits on debit-card swipe fees) did not raise their checking fees as much as the small banks that are exempt from debit reform.

Saying something over and over again doesn’t make it true. It’s time for the banks to stop peddling arguments that are so clearly false.


Senior vice president for government

and public affairs

Food Marketing Institute


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide