- The Washington Times - Wednesday, July 9, 2014

Staring at the possibility of a battle over gun control and other thorny issues he didn’t want to deal with, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid used parliamentary tactics to block out all amendments on a bill to expand hunting and fishing access on federal land, putting the brakes on the largely noncontroversial legislation.

The Nevada Democrat said Republicans were moving to undermine the bill by offering amendments to repeal D.C.’s gun control laws, expand the sale of some firearms across state lines, and effectively block the Senate from passing new gun controls.

He said he had to block out all amendments in order to keep the debate focused.

“They want amendments because they want to kill the bill, like they’ve tried to kill everything in the last six years,” he said.

But Republicans said Mr. Reid was ruining yet another chance for the Senate to vote on the big issues of the day.

“It’s an astonishing display of what a Majority Leader has done to muzzle an entire legislative body, both parties,” said Sen. John Barrasso, Wyoming Republican.

PHOTOS: Best concealed carry handguns

A Washington Times analysis this week found that Mr. Reid has been responsible for a third of all amendments proposed in 2014 on the floor of the 100-member chamber — a measure of how much he has dictated the rules for debate. The analysis also found that a single House Democratic lawmaker has been granted votes on more of her amendments than the entire Senate GOP.

With Mr. Reid’s latest blockade, the entire sportsmen’s bill is now in danger. Republicans have regularly filibustered bills they didn’t get a chance to amend.

Many of the amendments filed by members of both parties this week deal with conservation and federal land management. For example, Sen. Ted Cruz, Texas Republican, introduced one that would limit federal ownership of land to no more than 50 percent of a state’s area as disputes between the government and western ranchers have increasingly come to a head in recent months.

But the gun issue was grabbing the most attention.

Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican, filed the repeal of the District’s gun laws; Sen. Mike Lee, Utah Republican, sponsored the measure that would effectively block the Senate from passing new gun controls without a two-thirds vote; and Mr. Cruz sponsored the amendment to allow some firearms sales across state lines. Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican, filed another that would limit the ability to deny veterans access to guns because of mental health issues.

To counter the Republican moves on guns, Sen. Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, filed one to impose stiffer penalties on straw purchasers and illegal gun traffickers.

But a larger fight over guns could have forced some of Mr. Reid’s more vulnerable members to vote with Republicans on the measures or risk stirring up opposition among Second Amendment advocates in their states.

Democrats had hoped the sportsmen’s bill, which has bipartisan support, would be an easy win for Sen. Kay Hagan, the chief sponsor and North Carolina Democrat, who is facing a tough re-election bid this year.

But the bill is even splitting Democrats.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut said Wednesday he could not vote for a bill to expand federal gun rights before the Senate passes something that addresses gun violence. He introduced an amendment that would restrict access to guns from people under temporary restraining orders.

In the wake of the December 2012 shooting deaths of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, Senate Democrats and a handful of Republicans tried to pass legislation to tighten federal gun-purchase background checks.

But that bill, along with broader restrictions on military-style rifles and high-capacity magazines, fell victim to a filibuster in April 2013 and has not been seriously considered since then.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide