- - Sunday, June 15, 2014


People in Washington don’t like to admit that they were wrong. No one saw Rep. Eric Cantor’s primary loss coming, least of all David Brat, the economics professor who, on a shoestring budget, pulled off one of the biggest upsets in congressional history.

Understandably, everyone wants to know how, in retrospect, something so unlikely could have happened. These things don’t happen for no reason. However unlikely the outcome, there were causes, causes that nobody saw.

But they were there right in front of our eyes. Mr. Cantor, the second-most powerful member of the House of Representatives, the young man patiently waiting to become the first ever Jewish speaker of the House, was a victim of his own success. The conservative grass roots have, in the past two election cycles, been determined to reject anything even resembling “establishment” Republicans. Nothing is more establishment than serving in leadership.

Mr. Cantor had always been the compromise candidate, the one who didn’t fit any particular profile or stereotype. He was Southern, spoke with a twang, but he was a practicing Jew. He was principled and conservative, but determined to sell the Republican brand to those who were neither. He could speak the language of the talk radio conservative base, and, as a second language, could speak the language of the bleeding hearts, the hyper-sympathetic caucus on the other side of the aisle.

This latter skill, this second language of his, proved his undoing. Mr. Cantor’s willingness to support even the most abstract immigration reform principles won him no good will from Democrats, and outright hostility from his own base.

SEE ALSO: Cantor: ‘No regrets’ after stunning primary defeat

This is a case study in the folly of trying to beat Democrats by imitating them. Not only was Mr. Cantor felled by his own axe, but it was in regard to an issue that Republicans ought to speak about boldly.

The 11 million or so illegal immigrants in this country are the clearest indication of American exceptionalism that you can find. These people are fleeing totalitarian, socialist, leftist countries, and seeking the welcoming United States. We are the only country on earth that won’t turn them away.

President Obama’s phony “prosecutorial discretion” policy — which is to say, not prosecutorial discretion but policy — is encouraging these poor, indigent people to send their children, alone, to the United States, knowing that we will give them the better life that they desire rather than enforce our own laws.

If anything is wrong, it is surely not that the United States would like a secure border, but that these regimes to our south are unjust, cruel and are hurting innocent people. Free markets oppress no one. Free markets are the opposite of oppression; they are the abnegation of authority. But man oppresses man. Dictators oppress honest, Christian people, and exploit the good will and charity of the United States. If there is a wrong here, it is not that we are a nation of laws, but that other countries are not.

Leftist politicians in Latin America and in our own country appeal to our emotions, to our instincts. But surely we must be compassionate to the millions of Americans who do not have jobs, the millions who actually pay taxes, the millions who are already overloading our welfare system. Why do we allow the governments of Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala to exploit us? This country should be outraged at our leadership for not securing our borders. Do any of these Democrat politicians leave their doors unlocked at night?

It is not unjust that we have laws; it is unjust that some people think that they are above those laws. While millions wait in line, earnestly hoping to become Americans, illegal immigrants are literally thieves.

The defeat of Eric Cantor is a heavy loss for the prospects of immigration reform in Congress. The American working class just breathed a sigh of relief.

Armstrong Williams is sole owner/manager of Howard Stirk Holdings and executive editor of American CurrentSee Online Magazine.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide