- Associated Press - Wednesday, March 12, 2014

OXFORD, Miss. (AP) - A former Mississippi and Alabama prep football coach has asked a federal court for a hearing on his motion to set aside or reconsider his sentence to multiple guilty pleas that he transported minor males across state lines for sex.

Dwight Bowling argues in court documents filed this past week in U.S. District Court in Oxford that briefs have been filed by his attorney and the government and now is the time for oral arguments on his motion. Prosecutors said a hearing isn’t necessary because Bowling hasn’t proved his 300-month prison sentence is excessive.

Bowling pleaded guilty in 2011 to numerous state and federal charges related to sex acts with boys. He was sentenced in federal court to 25 years. In state court, he was sentenced to 35 years. He also pleaded guilty to attempting to tamper with a potential witness’s testimony.

Bowling coached for 28 years at Smithville before retiring and coaching at Sulligent High in Sulligent, Ala. The molestations alleged in his indictment are said to have happened between 2004 and 2010.

Bowling was coaching for the Alabama school when he was arrested Sept. 18, 2010 in Mississippi on his way home from a game. Authorities said a 13-year-old boy who was with Bowling at the time of his arrest accused him of improper touching.

The investigation uncovered at least four victims, boys between the ages of 13 and 18.

Bowling had a previous appeal dismissed from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2012.

He filed a motion to vacate his sentence last September in the Oxford court claiming his attorney didn’t file an appeal in time and was therefore ineffective.

Bowling argued his attorney, Christi McCoy, didn’t file his sentencing appeal within the given time frame and was therefore ineffective counsel. But, in an email exchange included in the motion, he essentially fired McCoy, told her he doesn’t plan to pay his final bill and told her he is asking for another attorney.

He also told her he didn’t want to spend another penny fighting the case.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul D. Roberts, in his response to the motion, said Bowling’s explicit instructions to his counsel not to file an appeal preclude any complaint that his attorney violated his rights when she followed his instructions.

Roberts said Bowling must be able to show he requested an appeal and did not prevent his counsel from filing the notice of appeal to prove ineffective assistance of counsel.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide