- - Tuesday, September 22, 2015


Is there anyone else out there who’s just as frustrated as I am that the presidential candidates are not debating the issues Americans worry about most?

With few exceptions, the last Republican debate seemed to be about issues that do not even make the top 10 list of the voters deepest concerns — or even make the list at all.

A self-absorbed, egotistical Donald Trump is repeatedly telling voters how successful he is, but I have yet to hear him lay out a detailed plan to get the mediocre Obama economy running on all cylinders.

Instead, we are subjected to Mr. Trump’s insulting, infantile remarks about Carly Fiorina’s face — for which he refuses to apologize.

After last week’s candidate debate, Republican pollster David Winston was just as frustrated that the Republican debate didn’t focus on the economy, which is far and away the number one issue in every voter poll.

“Whenever the candidates are not talking about jobs and the economy, they’re off on the wrong topic,” he said.

James Pethokoukis, an economics scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, went through the transcript of Wednesday’s debate to count the subjects that came up for discussion.

There were 10 references on the Middle East; four that dealt with the middle class; 23 about defunding Planned Parenthood; seven on building a 2,000 mile concrete wall along the U.S.-Mexican border; and only five touching on the economy.

What were the messages the voters drew from the GOP debate? That Republicans don’t have much to say about their chief concerns, Mr. Pethokoukis said.

“What should be the core Republican themes — growth and upward mobility — didn’t get much play,” he said.

Peter Wehner, senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, was similarly concerned that the subject matter in the GOP debates will deeply damage its position in the 2016 election.

“I shook my head, thinking, ‘Oh, my gosh, we’ve spent 20 minutes talking about birthright citizenship,’” Mr. Wehner told The Washington Post.

But the absence of any real discussion of the anemic economic recovery under the Democrats — the longest since the Great Depression — was due to CNN moderator Jake Tapper who should know better.

Every poll taken under this presidency that asks what are “your biggest worries” about our country shows that 40 percent of Americans say the economy, jobs and declining incomes.

But the liberal news media has been playing down the economy’s ill health or ignoring it altogether.

“It’s a product of the questions that were asked,” Mr. Wehner said. “Marco Rubio would love to talk about college affordability and student debt. And Jeb Bush, I don’t know that there’s any issue he’d rather talk about than social mobility.”

Mr. Bush unveiled a sweeping economic reform agenda last week to boost the economy’s sluggish growth rate to 4 percent or higher. But his plan received little if any national media attention, while the nightly news networks focused on Mr. Trump’s feuds with Mrs. Fiorina and Mr. Bush.

“Jeb’s whole campaign is all about economic growth He rolls out the most significant piece of his plan to get us rolling at 4 percent, and it’s ignored. That’s unfortunate,” says Edward Lazear, a prominent senior fellow in economic policy at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.

It is hard to overstate how disastrous the economy has been under the Obama Democrats in terms of sagging incomes and weak job creation.

The U.S. Census Bureau released sobering economic data last week that said real median household incomes have been flat or falling for the majority of Americans every year since the recession.

For example, the report said that last year’s median income level was 6.5 percent lower than it was in 2007.

“Five years after the recession was officially declared over, the typical American household was still shambling along without a real raise,” The Washington Post reported.

“For most in America, real income isn’t budging,” the Post said.

You didn’t hear that on the national network news this week, did you? I wonder why?

Wages remain flat, business investment has been slow- to-barely-budging over the course of Obama’s presidency.

And the economy isn’t going to get much better in the seventh and eighth year of this failed administration.

The International Monetary Fund is now forecasting that U.S. economic growth (GDP) will increase by a sluggish 2.5 percent this year.

That means fewer jobs that are not keeping pace with the nation’s population growth.

It also means workers won’t be getting raises anytime soon with so much slack in the labor market. The so-called “shadow unemployed” — millions of discouraged workers who have given up looking for a job — are not counted by the government as unemployed.

That’s how the administration has been able to lower the unemployment rate without producing very many jobs.

The Republicans need to start pounding the economy into the consciousness of America’s voters, explaining why new homes sales have tumbled this month because prices are rising faster than incomes.

And they are only going to effectively start doing that by demanding that the economy has to be a major share of the issues under discussion in future debates.

Or better yet, start holding debates that focus entirely on economic issues that allow candidates time to explain how their plans will put tens of millions of long unemployed Americans back to work at higher salaries.

And how Barack Obama and the Democrats have been blocking our country’s economic progress and smothering the American Dream.

Donald Lambro is a syndicated columnist and contributor to The Washington Times.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide