- - Monday, June 12, 2017

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Is former FBI Director James Comey so obtuse that he does not realize his own complicity in orchestrating his Jan. 6, 2017, meeting with President Trump in a manner that set the parameters for the two men’s interpersonal relationship (“James Comey debunks New York Times story that fueled unproven Trump-Russia collusion,” Web, June 8)?

At the end of the group briefing that day, Mr. Comey took the initiative to remain behind to give Mr. Trump a private briefing. During the briefing, Mr. Comey informed Mr. Trump of the imminent release of the “Trump dossier” and assured the president that he was not personally under investigation. Within the climate of continued leaks of classified intelligence and innuendo pertaining to Mr. Trump’s associates, Mr. Trump would have taken Mr. Comey’s overtures and assurance as a signal that Mr. Comey preferred to meet with Mr. Trump privately, that Mr. Comey had an understanding of what Mr. Trump perceived to be a “witch hunt,” and that Mr. Trump might be able to confide in Mr. Comey.

Why, then, would Mr. Comey be surprised that Mr. Trump would invite him to a private dinner Jan. 27, or telephone him directly?

WILLIAM T. FIDURSKI

Clark, N.J.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide