- Associated Press - Wednesday, March 28, 2018

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) - The Ohio Supreme Court proposed a rule Wednesday clarifying that sitting judges who launch campaigns for non-judicial office must step down from the bench.

The proposed rule change , which is open for public comment through April 25, follows then-Justice William O’Neill’s decision to remain on the court from Oct. 29, when he announced his candidacy for governor, until he retired Jan. 26.

O’Neill, a Democrat, insisted that he was not a “candidate” under Ohio’s rules of judicial conduct because he hadn’t yet filed the necessary paperwork.

His position riled many in Ohio’s legal community, including Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor, who said O’Neill’s refusal to leave the court represented a violation of the prohibition against campaigning for non-judicial office while acting as a judge.

State Rep. Niraj Antani, a Miamisburg Republican, started formal removal proceedings against O’Neill for violating the rule, though O’Neill had retired by the time the ball got rolling.

The proposed rule change makes explicit that a judge becomes a “candidate” when the judge has made a public announcement of candidacy and “taken or engaged in any public action in furtherance of that candidacy”; declared or filed as a candidate; or begun soliciting contributions - whichever comes first.

O’Neill said he supports the latter two sections of the rule - but thinks any prohibition against campaigning while seated on a court is unconstitutional.

“Once they muzzle judges that want to run for another office, they’ve crossed the line,” he said on Wednesday.

He cited Minnesota vs. White, a 2002 case in which the U.S. Supreme Court found a rule of judicial conduct in Minnesota that prohibited candidates for judicial office from announcing their views “on disputed legal or political issues” was in violation of their First Amendment free-speech rights.

O’Neill still maintains that his campaign launch in October was the announcement of a future candidacy. He said before filing as a candidate and retiring from the high court, he took no campaign contributions, circulated no candidate petitions and followed through with his promise to finish the 99 cases on his docket

“I think they’ll find that public comment supports that I did nothing wrong when I stayed on the bench last year,” he said. “And I welcome the Ohio Supreme Court adopting ‘the O’Neill Rule,’ which is no fundraising and no circulating of petitions until you become a candidate.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide