- The Washington Times - Thursday, May 30, 2019

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Robert Mueller just wants to feel the love again. His press clippings have faded and life hasn’t been the same for the man choking on rectitude and righteousness, not since he turned in his account of the vain pursuit of Donald Trump and the Russians. After more than two years trying to find the president in bed with Vladimir Putin, he didn’t even find the bed.

After months of anticipation of the gift from the righteous Santa, all the Democrats got in their stockings were two or three lumps of coal. The Democrats turned on Santa with a vengeance. What expectant Democrats thought was rectitude turned out to be betrayal.

Nobody likes to have his feelings hurt. After weeks of brooding, Mr. Mueller finally emerged from hiding to give a valedictory speech — nine minutes and counting — to say goodbye to the Justice Department. He packed up his pens, legal pads and what was left of a family-size box of bicarbonate of soda, and did his duty. Boiled down, it was something like “Hey! Guys, can’t you take a joke?” He meant to do something to erase the results of the 2016 election, he really did, but a man of rectitude must be “guided by the principles of fairness.”

“It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge,” particularly since, so far as Mr. Mueller was able to figure out, there was no crime. He clearly thinks the president ought to be put in the dock, but somebody else has to do the job he was paid to do. Mr. Mueller wouldn’t do anything like a hanging, of course, but he might stand in the shade of the hanging tree and clap his hands.

Mr. Mueller and his team of crack investigators are said to have been frustrated by a lack of public and congressional understanding of just how justice, and the Justice Department, actually work.



He couldn’t run the unicorn to ground, but it wasn’t his fault. Justice Department guidelines say a president can’t be indicted. That’s work for the House of Representatives, and it’s called impeachment. So, just to be fair, Mr. Mueller wants everybody to know that he couldn’t have indicted the president even if he had wanted to, but because he’s a stand-up guy he won’t say whether he would have if he could have.

He did say the Russians he indicted for piddling offenses they will never have to answer to because they’re already back home in Russia, are innocent until proved guilty. If anybody wants to think the president is guilty until proved innocent, well, it’s a free country and everybody is free to think what they want to.

The report Mr. Mueller turned in shows that he found no evidence of a conspiracy to collude with anybody about anything, and if he were the righteous stand-up guy he wants everybody to think he is, he would have said so, loud and clear. But then he would never feel the love again.

The righteous stand-up guy left it to William P. Barr, the attorney general, to decide whether Mr. Mueller’s evidence would support an impeachment prosecution for obstruction. This was the decision that Mr. Mueller should have made, but righteous stand-up guys sometimes have to get someone else to do their work.

Mr. Mueller’s grudging conclusion that he and his crack investigators found no evidence of presidential collusion with the Russians to cook the 2016 election left the Democrats with nowhere to go but to the proposition that the president tried to obstruct Mr. Mueller. The righteous stand-up guy took a powder on that, too.

Mr. Mueller’s report makes clear that nothing was obstructed. “Not the FBI counter-intelligence probe,” The Wall Street Journal observes, “and not his own. No witnesses were interfered with, and Mr. Mueller was allowed to issue nearly 500 search-and-seizure warrants and interview anyone he wanted, including anyone in the White House.”

Nancy Pelosi is entitled to feel the love, or at least appreciation, for trying to keep her cowboys from driving the campaign wagon off the cliff. The Democrats have a chance — nothing like Hillary’s slam-dunk, but a chance — to take back the White House next year, and the cowboys obviously prefer the entertainment of an impeachment frenzy to the hard work of winning an election.

Such a frenzy would be right up Donald Trump’s street, with 24/7 tweetstorms and new sensations in every round-the-clock news cycle. The Democrats can impeach, but that’s only the half of it. The needed majority would never convict. Mrs. Pelosi understands that, and further understands that a failed impeachment would guarantee four more years of the man the Democrats live to hate.

• Wesley Pruden is editor in chief emeritus of The Times.

Sign up for Daily Opinion Newsletter

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide