- - Thursday, October 10, 2019


President Trump’s legal troubles are growing faster than the number of whistleblowers who are coming forward to testify before Congress.

The attorney representing the whistleblower, who broke the story about Mr. Trump’s efforts to persuade the president of Ukraine to dig up dirt on his likely opponent in the 2020 presidential election, says that others are waiting to testify.
“I can confirm that my firm and my team represent multiple whistleblowers in connection to the underlying Aug. 12, 2019, disclosure to the Intelligence Community Inspector General,” the whistleblower’s lawyer, Andrew Bakaj, said in a tweet,” The Washington Post reported on Monday.

Mark Zaid, another member of the whistleblower’s legal team, confirmed they represent a second whistleblower who also works in the intelligence community.
“The second individual has spoken to the inspector general of the intelligence community” though he has not filed a complaint,” The Post said.

He “doesn’t need to,” Mr. Zaid said, because he has “first hand knowledge that supported the first whistleblower.”

This newest development was first reported Sunday by ABC News.

As is his habit, Mr. Trump has dismissed the whistleblowers testimony without citing a single piece of evidence to the contrary.

“Democrat lawyer is same for both Whistleblowers? All support Obama and Crooked Hillary. Witch Hunt!” Mr. Trump tweeted.

But the facts of the matter recited by the whistleblower and the accompanying transcripts and testimony over the last two weeks, even in the president’s own statements, “bolster the facts outlined in the extraordinary abuse-of-power complaint,” The Post reported.

The transcript of the July 25 telephone conversation between Mr. Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky accurately matches the whistleblower’s charges.
Mr. Trump asked him in a phone call to “do me a favor” by digging up the details that led to a high paying job on the board of a major Ukrainian energy company for Mr. Biden’s son.

“I will have Mr. Giuliani [Trump’s White House attorney] give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Zelensky in the White House account of their conversation. “I’m sure you will figure it out.”

Why did Mr. Trump want Mr. Zelensky to dig up dirt on Mr. Biden and his son? To use it in his upcoming 2020 campaign if Mr. Biden becomes the Democratic presidential nominee.

To date, nothing has been proven to show that Hunter Biden, or his father, did anything wrong, but that’s not going keep Mr. Trump from leveling corruption charges in the midst of his campaign if it will help him win re-election.

Mr. Trump came into office in the midst of a huge scandal: That Russia interfered in the election by conducting a high level cyberwar campaign within our nation’s internet that helped him win the presidency. Mr. Trump called the scandal a hoax and “fake news” and denies he had anything to do with it.

But our intelligence community says it was real and had an impact on our last election, despite Vladimir Putin’s persistent denials.

At their last face to face meeting, Mr. Trump said he asked Mr. Putin if Russia played a role in the attack on our elections, and the former KGB agent said it did not. Mr. Trump said he believed him.

Now Mr. Trump has asked the president of Ukraine to do him “a favor” by launching an investigation into the leading contender for the Democratic presidential nomination.

That has spawned a full impeachment inquiry in the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives on the basis of a rough transcript of what he asked the Ukrainian president to do for him.

Mr. Trump insists he did nothing wrong, but a Washington Post-Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University poll found this week that by a margin of 58 percent to 38 percent, “Americans say the House was correct to open the inquiry.”

Moreover, “a clear majority of Americans say Trump’s request to investigate Biden and his son was inappropriate (62 percent to 32 percent who thought it was not).”

Let the House impeachment inquiry begin.

• Donald Lambro is a syndicated columnist and contributor to The Washington Times.

Sign up for Daily Opinion Newsletter

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide