- The Washington Times - Wednesday, June 16, 2021

Middle school students in Buffalo, New York, were assigned to read an essay as part of the district’s “emancipation curriculum” this year that “the United States was founded as a racist society.”

As homework, they were to read an essay stating that “all White people play a part in perpetuating systemic racism.”

Eleventh-graders in Seattle Public Schools will be taught critical race theory as part of a program inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement.

Central to the theory is the idea that U.S. laws and institutions are inherently racist and that Whites still oppress Blacks and other people of color more than 150 years after the end of slavery and decades after advances of the civil rights movement.

This school of thought is spreading rapidly through American classrooms, workplaces and government offices. It grew out of a field called critical legal theory, which took root in the 1970s, according to the American Bar Association.

Critical legal theory breaks with the belief that law is pure. It argues instead that societal biases such as race and class influence law.

Critical race theory’s adherents generally broaden the traditional view that racism is perpetrated by individuals. Racism, they say, is ingrained in American democracy.

In other words, although White people may think they are not racist, they are part of and benefit from a racist system.

Pioneers of critical race theory included Derrick Bell, who taught at Harvard University.

Bell, who died in 2011, is recognized as the godfather of the movement, according to a paper on critical race theory by the conservative Heritage Foundation.

“As I see it, critical race theory recognizes that revolutionizing a culture begins with the radical assessment of it,’” Bell wrote in an essay cited by Heritage.

Others who helped establish the intellectual movement include law professors Kimberle Crenshaw of UCLA and Columbia University, Cheryl Harris of UCLA, Richard Delgado of the University of Alabama and Patricia Williams of Columbia University.

Ms. Crenshaw “didn’t believe racism ceased to exist in 1965 with the passage of the Civil Rights Act, nor that racism was a mere multi-century aberration that, once corrected through legislative action, would no longer impact the law or the people who rely upon it,” according to a 2019 profile in Vox. “Rather, as Crenshaw wrote, discrimination remains because of the ‘stubborn endurance of the structures of White dominance.’”

Until recently, the teaching of slavery focused on the actions of specific people, whether it be slave owners or members of the Ku Klux Klan, said Dorinda Carter Andrews, chairwoman of Michigan State University’s department of teacher education.

She credited critical race theory with helping educational thought evolve to a broader approach to racism.

“What teachers are trying to do is get young people to think of slavery not just as the actions of what White individual people do to individual Black folks, but see slavery as part of an economic system at the time,” she said.

Using that broader view, teachers are discussing how the U.S. system of government continues to disadvantage people of color.

“Critical race theory doesn’t claim that White people are bad,” Ms. Andrews said. “It is opposed to any form of racism in which one group has systemic power over another.”

The material used in classrooms, however, often takes a decidedly negative view of White people.

City Journal, a publication of the conservative Manhattan Institute, showcased the essay that Buffalo middle school students were assigned to read as a prime example of critical race theory in practice.

The essay, “Definition of Systemic Racism in Sociology,” was written by sociologist Nicki Lisa Cole. It says “all White people play a part in perpetuating systemic racism.”

The essay contends that systemic racism “is premised on the research-supported claim that the United States was founded as a racist society, that racism is thus embedded in all social institutions, structures and social relations within our society.”

Ms. Cole, of the Graz Institute of Technology in Styria, Austria, wrote that racism is everywhere: “It is present in our laws, our politics, our economy; in our social institutions; and in how we think and act, whether consciously or subconsciously. It’s all around us and inside of us, and for this reason, resistance to racism must also be everywhere if we are to combat it.”

She cites fellow sociologist Joe Feagin: “Feagin uses historical evidence and demographic statistics to create a theory that asserts that the United States was founded in racism since the Constitution classified Black people as the property of White people. Feagin illustrates that the legal recognition of slavery based on race is a cornerstone of a racist social system in which resources and rights were and are unjustly given to White people and unjustly denied to people of color.”

Ms. Cole wrote, “These historical practices created a social system that had racist economic inequality built into its foundation and was followed through the years in numerous ways, like the practice of ‘redlining’ that prevented [people of color] from buying homes that would allow their family wealth to grow while protecting and stewarding the family wealth of White people.”

She concluded that the problem continues in the “massive difference in the average wealth of White versus Black and Latino families.”

Buffalo Public Schools declined to comment for this article.

Fatima Morrell, the school district’s associate superintendent for culturally and linguistically responsive initiatives, has said the classwork is not designed to indoctrinate students.

“We definitely have not pushed any political agendas,” she told WGRZ-TV in Buffalo. “We give them the research, and we allow them to have the discussion, and then to problematize and question anything they are learning,” she said. “Then we allow our students to make up their own minds about positions that they will take.”

Ms. Morrell said students need to be taught about systemic racism. “There is implicit bias, and there is systemic racism, and so we want to problematize that,” she said.

Critical race theory advocates insist the lessons better reflect reality in teachings about race, civics and American history.

Teaching that the ills of slavery continue to keep down people of color, they say, gives students a fuller understanding of the nation’s history and the current racial strife, rather than what they consider to be a Eurocentric, watered-down version that American schools have traditionally taught.

“I believe, if we’re intellectually honest without ourselves, we know that this country was founded on principles associated with White supremacy,” said David B. Miller, director of International Education Programs at Case Western Reserve University’s school of applied social sciences. “Unless and until we can have an honest discussion of the good, bad and ugly, the nation will continue to struggle with this.”

To many parents, however, the idea of systemic racism — that American laws and institutions such as education and health care are biased against minorities — is an oversimplistic fallacy.

Opponents warn that steeping children in critical race theory spreads a distorted view of America.

“It’s basically a narrative script that says White people are the oppressors and other people are at different levels of being oppressed,” said Asra Nomani, vice president for strategy and investigations at Parents Defending Education, which tracks race-based instruction at schools.

“It’s so simple-minded. It’s very shallow and very superficial and intellectually vacuous,” she said. “We definitely should talk about racism and discrimination, but we need to do it with a balanced lens.”

The principal of an elementary school in San Mateo, California, sent home an “oppression matrix” to guide parents in conversations with their children about race.

Society’s privileged people, the matrix said, are White people. Those labeled as oppressed included “Asian, Black, Latino/a, Native People.”

The school district did not respond to The Washington Times’ inquiries about the “oppression matrix.”

“By sending messages like White people are privileged and Black people aren’t, or that the system favors Whites over Blacks, it causes us to go into camps based on race,” Ms. Nomani said. “That actually is a departure from the civil rights movement and the nation’s ideals of a color-blind society.”

The spread of critical race theory in schools is fueling a backlash.

The Florida Department of Education last week barred the teaching of critical race theory in the state’s public schools. It said students should not have lessons that “distort historical events.”

Lawmakers in 15 other states have proposed bills barring the teaching of divisive ideas such as critical race theory.

Opponents also are flooding the U.S. Department of Education with complaints about a proposed grant program that would encourage K-12 schools to incorporate critical race theory into their curricula.

The proposal does not specifically mention critical race theory but includes The New York Times’ “1619 Project” as an example of what the Biden administration would like schools to use. The newspaper series has been criticized for its historical inaccuracies and presenting American icons such as President Lincoln in a negative light.

Christopher F. Rufo, a contributing editor of City Journal, wrote in the New York Post that school districts are using mandatory training sessions to hammer teachers with critical race theory.

In one session, Seattle public school teachers were told that “the United States was built off the stolen labor of kidnapped and enslaved Black people’s work,” according to Mr. Rufo’s account.

“At the conclusion of the training, teachers had to explain how they will practice “anti-racist pedagogy,” address the “social-justice movements taking place” and become “anti-racist outside the classroom,” he said.

“The main message: White teachers must recognize that they ‘are assigned considerable power and privilege in our society because of their ‘possession of white skin.’ To atone, they must self-consciously reject their ‘whiteness’ and become dedicated ‘anti-racist educator[s].’”

Seattle Public Schools declined to comment.

Critical race theory, opponents say, also is seeping into public policy.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, a conservative advocacy law firm, last month sued the Biden administration for prioritizing bars and restaurants owned by women and minorities to receive coronavirus relief funds. The lawsuit accused the administration of discriminating against White business owners.

The law firm also submitted comments against the Biden administration’s proposed grants for schools to teach critical race theory.

“CRT, is, at bottom, a Marxist experiment to remake society through class struggle. It is not an educational tool and certainly should not be funded with our tax dollars,” the group wrote.

• Kery Murakami can be reached at kmurakami@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2022 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide