- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 11, 2022

Have you noticed? The genuine bad feelings between Republicans and Democrats appear to be intensifying. Yes, here’s a poll, and the findings are alarming.

“Clear majorities of both Republicans and Democrats have long viewed the other party negatively, but the shares saying their opinions are very unfavorable in recent years is considerably higher today than it was in prior decades,” says the Pew Research Center in a wide-ranging analysis which tracked the trajectory of what the pollster deemed “partisan hostility.”

It’s growing.



“Deep partisan dislike of the ‘other side’ in politics remains substantially higher than it was even a decade ago,” the pollster advised in the report.

“Across Pew Research Center surveys conducted this year, 62% of Republicans and 54% of Democrats say they hold very unfavorable views of the other party,” the report said.

“By comparison, 10 years ago, 43% of Republicans and 46% of Democrats had very unfavorable views of the other party. And 10 years before that (in 2002), just two-in-ten Republicans (20%) and about a quarter of Democrats (26%) expressed very unfavorable views of the opposing party,” the report noted.

The acrimony is even present among those who merely lean towards one party or the other.

About half of Republican leaners (47%) have very unfavorable views of the Democratic Party – up from 2012, when 36% of Republican leaners held this view, and from 2002, when it was only 10%.

“Views of the Republican Party among Democratic leaners have followed the same pattern: 45% of Democratic leaners have a very unfavorable view of the Republican Party in Pew Research Center surveys this year — a significantly larger share than the 36% who said this in 2012 and the 19% who held this view in 2002,” the report said.

The findings are based on a survey of 6,174 U.S. adults conducted June 27-July 4 and released Tuesday.

FOR THE LEXICON

“IRS Army.”

This handy term comes from Torunn Sinclair, spokesperson for the National Republican Congressional Committee, who is looking askance at the U.S. House.

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has announced a future vote to fund an IRS army — but not law enforcement,” Ms. Sinclair said in a statement shared with Inside the Beltway.

“It’s a perfect example of Democrats’ priorities: Democrats plan this week to vote on hiring an army of IRS agents to audit middle-class taxpayers. But Ms. Pelosi has announced they won’t vote on law enforcement funding. Vulnerable House Democrats are prioritizing raising taxes and funding the IRS over funding law enforcement. They’re going to lose in November,” Ms. Sinclair predicted.

Americans for Tax Reform, meanwhile, is taking a peek at the particulars.

“The IRS has 4,600 guns and five million rounds of ammunition according to a report from OpenTheBooks published in 2020. With Democrats on the verge of passing $80 billion in additional funding to facilitate the hiring of 87,000 new agents, how much will this arsenal grow?” the taxpayer-advocacy group asked.

At the moment, the “arsenal” includes 3,282 pistols, 621 shotguns, 539 rifles, 15 fully automatic firearms and 4 revolvers, the group noted.

NOW THERE’S A THOUGHT

“In the one year since Kabul fell to the Taliban and the United States haphazardly withdrew from Afghanistan, we still don’t have full answers as to how the Biden Administration failed to see it coming and did not have an effective plan in place to evacuate American citizens and Afghan partners,” says Sen. James Risch of Idaho, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

The first anniversary of the collapse is Monday.

“In order to prevent a similar catastrophe from happening again, it’s imperative the Biden Administration seriously investigates what went wrong and learns from those mistakes,” Mr. Risch continued.

“The fact that it’s been a year and we have yet to see any comprehensive reports or policy corrections is not only concerning, but unacceptable,” he said in a statement shared with Inside the Beltway.

IVY-COVERED HALLS

The nation’s institutions of higher learning continue to offer courses that perhaps don’t conform to the academic rigors of yore.

Here’s a small sampling of course titles being offered at various schools this fall, courtesy of Campus Reform, a student-written news organization: “Tree Climbing” (Cornell University); “Harry Styles and the Cult of Celebrity” (Texas State University); “Transgender Studies” (Barndeis University); and “Hand Puppetry” (University of Connecticut).

“The courses and projects of the Puppet Arts Program are designed to imbue the students with the history and theories of Puppetry, to give them practice in multiple performance expressions and to give them experience with a variety of tools and materials. In addition to Puppet Arts courses, students are guided to take movement classes, fabric manipulation classes, design classes, drawing classes, rendering classes and stop motion classes,” the university advised in a course description.

WEEKEND REAL ESTATE

For sale: Stone farmhouse built in 1860 on 5 acres in Quakertown, Pennsylvania. Two bedrooms, two baths, completely restored inside and out; 1,763 square feet. Original chestnut and “pumpkin” pine floors, ceiling with beams, two fireplaces, exposed interior stone walls, new custom kitchen with stainless-steel farm sink, dining and living rooms. The property includes Dimple Creek, and is described as “a perfect weekend home for those trying to escape the city.” Priced at $685,000 through Kurfiss.com; enter GX26C6 in the search function.

POLL DU JOUR

• 9% of U.S. adults say the nation is “much more safe” now from terrorism than we were in 2001, the year of the Sept. 11 attacks.

• 24% say the nation is “somewhat more safe” compared to 2001.

• 27% say the nation is “about as safe” now.

• 12% say we are “somewhat less safe.”

• 17% say we are “much less safe.”

• 11% are not sure about the issue.

SOURCE: An Economist/YouGov poll of 1,500 U.S. adults conducted Aug. 7-9.

• Follow Jennifer Harper on Twitter @HarperBulletin

• Jennifer Harper can be reached at jharper@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2022 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide