- The Washington Times - Wednesday, July 6, 2022

Pro-life doctors sounded the alarm Wednesday about the Biden administration’s effort to expand access to abortion pills, arguing that lifting restrictions will put the lives of pregnant women at risk.

Leaders of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) said the White House and leading medical groups are failing to warn the public about the dangers associated with allowing at-home chemical abortion medication to be delivered by mail without an in-person clinic visit.

“We need to protect our women patients from this push for DIY medication abortions,” Dr. Christina Francis, a board-certified OB-GYN in Fort Wayne, Indiana, and the CEO-elect of the pro-life physicians group, said on a press call.

“This is dangerous,” she said. “This at-home use of these medications is dangerous for many reasons.”

Dr. Francis said women should undergo in-person examinations to determine how far along they are in pregnancy before taking the pills.

“Women should also be screened for a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy, which occurs in 1 in 50 pregnancies, preferably with an ultrasound,” said Dr. Donna Harrison, CEO of AAPLOG and a board-certified OB-GYN.

SEE ALSO: COVID would have killed 58% more Americans without vaccines: Study

“By not having an ultrasound, by allowing home use, you have 1 out of 50 women who are at risk of dying because the symptoms of a rupturing ectopic pregnancy are exactly the same symptoms as a Mifeprex abortion: pain and bleeding,” she said.

“There have been women who have called with pain and bleeding and they were told, ‘Honey, lay down and take a Tylenol,’ and they bled to death because they had a rupturing ectopic pregnancy,” she said.

Their message ran counter to the White House push to increase access to at-home chemical abortions in reaction to state restrictions on the procedures in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s June reversal of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that made abortion a federal constitutional right.

In December, the Food and Drug Administration allowed mifepristone and misoprostol, the two-part chemical abortion protocol, to be prescribed via telehealth during the pandemic, and then made the rules permanent.

The agency also required pharmacies that dispense mifepristone to be certified.

The FDA decision was cheered by a host of medical groups, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), which called the new rules a “safe and effective regimen for medication abortion.”

“Decades of evidence and the consensus of the medical community underscore that mifepristone is a safe medication, the FDA requirements do not benefit patients, and the FDA requirements disproportionately burden communities already facing structural barriers to care, including people of color and those living long distances from a health care professional,” ACOG leaders said in a March statement.

Last week, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said his department would seek to make abortion pills more accessible through federal programs. He cited a June 24 directive from President Biden.

“First, HHS will take steps to increase access to medication abortion,” he said. “Federal law requires our programs to provide medication abortion in limited circumstances, including life of the woman, rape, or incest. Now more than ever it is imperative that all federally-supported programs and services are complying and providing this under the law.”

The pro-life doctors said the administration’s moves fail to take into account the risks associated with abortion pills as well as public opinion.

The organization released a poll Wednesday showing that 54% of registered voters “oppose unsupervised, at-home medication abortions,” while 30% support them and 10% fall into the “depends/neutral” category.

The poll was conducted June 3-6 with 1,600 registered voters nationally. The margin of error was 2.45 percentage points.

The survey included a question about emergency room visits resulting from chemical abortions. Citing its analysis of Medicaid claims data, the group said the number of visits increased 500% from 2002 to 2015.

“That figure was before the FDA relaxed its rules, and with all of these restrictions in place, with women having to see a physician in person,” Dr. Francis said.

“So we know that these complications are only going to increase when you remove the physician from that process,” she said. “So we need to call for better health care for our patients. Women deserve better than what they’re receiving from the abortion industry. They deserve accurate information.”

Medication abortions accounted for more than half of all procedures for the first time in 2020.

A 2018 study by the National Academies of Sciences found a “very low rate of serious complications,” according to the pro-choice Guttmacher Institute.

The pro-life doctors group called for more extensive and accurate data collection on abortion.

States are not required to track or report abortion statistics to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which releases an annual report on abortion data. One of the states that does not report data is California.

The pro-life doctors also pushed back on what they described as “fearmongering” from the pro-choice movement, such as raising concerns that doctors may not treat pregnant women for miscarriages or ectopic pregnancies for fear of violating state abortion laws.

“Women will not be in danger of not being able to be treated for ectopic pregnancy, for miscarriage or even other life-threatening complications of pregnancy,” Dr. Francis said. “For those of us who are pro-life physicians, I can tell you, I’ve been in practice for 14 years. I have never, ever needed to perform an abortion, and yet I have been able to provide excellent health care for my patients.”

Dr. Francis accused pro-choice advocates of spreading disinformation and making women needlessly fearful.

“I think for people who are intentionally fearmongering and spreading this false narrative that women are not going to be able to receive lifesaving care, not only are they blatant lies but they’re also making women feel very fearful,” she said.

She pointed to Catholic hospitals, which as a moral matter do not provide abortions regardless of state laws.

“Even with Roe, they were still taking care of ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages without abortions,” she said. “What we’re talking about are elective, induced abortions.”

The 50-year-old pro-life physicians group has about 7,000 members, far fewer than the 60,000 who belong to ACOG, but Dr. Harrison said more than 80% of OB-GYNs don’t perform abortions, an indication that they “vote with their scalpel.”

“The vast majority of us do not perform abortions. I don’t do it because I know it’s not health care,” she said.

She urged people concerned about stricter abortion laws to read the bills’ language.

“Not one single one of them criminalizes a doctor for taking care of a patient in a life-threatening situation,” Dr. Harrison said. “This whole fearmongering that’s being done is not in reference to reality. Read the actual text of the bills in your states.”

• Valerie Richardson can be reached at vrichardson@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide