- The Washington Times - Wednesday, June 1, 2022

Russia’s hot war in Ukraine could be about to turn cold.

With Friday marking the 100th day of the invasion, it has become clear that Russian President Vladimir Putin has scaled back his once-lofty ambitions of immediately decapitating the Ukrainian government and bringing most, if not all, of the country under Moscow’s thumb.

Instead, Mr. Putin and his military leaders have revamped their mission. They mounted a fierce offensive on eastern Ukraine’s disputed Donbas region and sought to drive enemy forces out of the Luhansk and Donetsk provinces.

In the process, the Kremlin has redefined victory and all but assured a long, drawn-out slog that will likely kill thousands more and exacerbate growing food and refugee crises in Europe. 

NATO, which Mr. Putin hoped to intimidate with his military campaign, shows a newfound sense of purpose. The alliance is poised to boost defense spending and expand its membership as a direct result of the Russian offensive.

Russia, at least in the short term, might be content to chip away at Ukrainian defenses and bring more of the country’s eastern flank into its orbit. Such a strategy is on clear display this week as Russian troops mercilessly pound the city of Sievierodonetsk, which is now largely under Russian occupation, much like the strategically vital port city of Mariupol.

SEE ALSO: Biden belittles Russian nuke threats as U.S, allies send more arms to Kyiv

Now that the war is confined to a much smaller theater in eastern and southern Ukraine, foreign policy specialists say Moscow and Kyiv are engaged not in a continent-altering clash but in an era of “frozen,” highly localized conflict. That reality could result in few notable gains on the battlefield even as the fighting fuels more death and destruction across Ukraine and economic turmoil worldwide.

Some analysts say Mr. Putin’s overall long-term goal — driving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy from power and installing a compliant regime in his place — hasn’t changed. But he now appears forced to pursue that strategy in a much more measured, gradual way: by draining Ukrainians’ will to fight and eroding the West’s tolerance for economic pain with slow, bloody, prolonged ground attacks and continuous shellings of cities.

“I do believe Mr. Putin and his military have seen they now have to change their overall expectations,” said retired Air Force Gen. Philip M. Breedlove, former NATO allied supreme commander in Europe. 

Just months ago, Russian forces were on the outskirts of Kyiv, Kharkiv and other major Ukrainian cities. Now they are struggling to make marginal gains along Ukraine’s far eastern and southern regions.

“I don’t see them proceeding further southwest along the coast toward Odesa,” Gen. Breedlove said Wednesday at a virtual event hosted by the American Security Project. “They’re already starting to fortify some positions, meaning they don’t intend to move forward.

“I think what we see on the battlefield is a Russia that is trying to solidify the few gains that it’s made — few but important gains it’s made in the Donbas so that Mr. Putin can declare a victory and try to freeze the conflict now with more Ukrainian land in his possession,” he said.

SEE ALSO: U.S. sending advanced missile system to Ukraine

For Ukraine, a frozen conflict likely means more instability and limited chances for a clear victory, absent a significant Western military intervention. Before the full-scale war began on Feb. 24, pro-Russian separatist forces backed by Mr. Putin’s armies were battling Ukrainian troops in the Donbas. Kyiv was unable to liberate that territory, nor was it able to prevent Moscow from seizing the Crimean Peninsula in a largely bloodless annexation in 2014.

It’s far too early to draw conclusions about how or when the war may end. Pentagon officials say the brutal, close-quarters fighting in the Donbas means momentum could swing wildly over the coming weeks and months.

“It is, in many ways, a very close and intimate fight. I think I’ve described it as a knife fight, and that’s not an inaccurate way of putting it,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said last week. “There are places, towns, villages, hamlets that the Russians and Ukrainians are in very close contact. And it’s very dynamic. … There are towns and villages which fall to the Russians on a given day, and then the Ukrainians will recover [them] days later. There’s still a lot of back-and-forth.

“And I don’t think being predictive about how long it’s going to take or who’s going to win is a useful exercise right now,” he said. “What we are focused on is making sure that the Ukrainians can succeed on the battlefield. And again, that’s the nature of the conversations that we’re having.”

Alternate realities

After defying the expectations of U.S. government and private analysts, observers say, the conflict could take several paths. Russia could continue making slow, incremental gains in the Donbas, breathing new life into the Russian war machine, boosting morale among its troops, and giving Mr. Putin newfound leverage to push for a cease-fire on his terms.

If the West continues direct support for Ukraine, such a scenario could quickly spiral out of control, researchers with the Atlantic Council think tank wrote recently in a detailed analysis that explored several possibilities.

“Further into 2023, NATO allies continue to send more lethal military aid as Ukraine — which refused Putin’s proposed cease-fire — tries to retake occupied territory. The quality and quantity of this aid tempts Moscow to continue disrupting supply flows into Ukraine, increasing the risk of attacks close to (or even on) NATO territory while widening the conflict between the alliance and Russia,” Atlantic Council scholars Mathew Burrows and Robert A. Manning wrote. They mapped out a scenario in which Russia captures more territory in the Donbas and slowly strangles the Ukrainian resistance.

“By late 2023, Western consensus is fraying,” they wrote of that theoretical future. “Concerned by economic costs, Ukrainian suffering, refugee burdens, and fears of escalation (including the risk of a nuclear attack by Russia), Germany and France lead a multinational effort to press Kyiv to [explore] a peace arrangement with Moscow.”

Other possible outcomes include energized and better-armed Ukrainian forces driving back Russian invaders, as they did in late February and early March during the battle for Kyiv

Ukrainian troops also pushed Russian forces away from Kharkiv, the country’s second-largest city, effectively ending Russia’s military push north of the Donbas.

If the conflict remains truly frozen, with neither side making any significant gains over a period of months or even years, Mr. Putin could face growing pressure at home to abandon the war and strike a deal with Mr. Zelenskyy, Mr. Burrows and Mr. Manning wrote. 

How the U.S. and its European allies might handle a lengthy, frozen conflict is a key question. For now, NATO remains mostly aligned in its commitment to massive economic sanctions on Moscow. Europe also is seeking to move away rapidly from its dependence on Russian oil and gas.

The White House on Wednesday announced a $700 million military assistance package to Ukraine, underscoring President Biden’s commitment, at least for now, to providing direct aid to Ukrainian fighters over the loud objections of the Kremlin. 

Months or years of conflict could make such an approach more difficult as Washington and other Western capitals face pressures of their own.

Soaring gas prices have complicated the equation, and a war between two of the world’s great grain producers has sent food prices soaring and unnerved governments across the Middle East and Asia. Mr. Biden and his European counterparts could face pressure to push harder for a cease-fire agreement if fuel and food costs keep rising.

Mr. Zelenskyy, who has shot to global stardom as the face of his country’s surprisingly effective resistance, also faces hard questions about terms for a cease-fire. Ukrainian officials insist they will never relinquish sovereignty claims, including to Crimea, but a return to the status quo before Feb. 24 would leave significant swaths of the Donbas effectively in Russia’s control.

Although Russian losses in troops and materiel have been massive, Mr. Zelenskyy revealed in an interview this week with the U.S. network Newsmax that his country is averaging 100 deaths and some 500 more wounded every day in the fighting. “The situation is very difficult,” he acknowledged.

U.S. and NATO officials have said they would accept any agreement to end the fighting that is acceptable to the government in Kyiv.

Some observers say it’s vital that the West remain firm, no matter how long the fighting lasts.

“Now we have to determine how we resolve this conflict,” Gen. Breedlove said. “Will we once again reward bad behavior by giving Mr. Putin the land he has grabbed in this war?”

• Ben Wolfgang can be reached at bwolfgang@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide

Sponsored Stories