The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    Senate chided for slow approval of new border chief

  • Business

    China's yuan value hits U.S. economy, two experts say

  • National

    Suicides spur review of Massachusetts bullying bill

  • National

    SANDERS: Watch out if Iran becomes the 10th nuclear power

  • National

    FBI's effective Most Wanted list turns 60

  • Politics

    Pay raise sought for bilingual fed workers

  • National

    Ex-chief regrets D.C. fire merger with EMS

Friday, May 25, 2007

Congress OKs war bill sans timeline

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • China's yuan value hits U.S. economy, two experts say
  • Suicides spur review of Massachusetts bullying bill
  • Technicians can't replicate runaway Prius
  • Pakistani jets pound Taliban hide-outs

By

Both chambers of Congress yesterday passed a $120 billion war-funding bill without troop-withdrawal timetables for Iraq, ending a 108-day standoff with the White House as Democrats forfeited demands for a pullout.

The Democratic leadership's painful defeat in challenging President Bush on war policy was evident in the 280-142 House vote, with 194 Republicans and 86 Democrats supporting the war funding. More than half the Democratic caucus, 140 members, voted against it, as did Republican Reps. John J. "Jimmy" Duncan Jr. of Tennessee and Ron Paul of Texas.

In the Senate, it garnered more bipartisan support to pass 80-14, winning "yes" votes from 42 Republicans, 37 Democrats and one independent, while 10 Democrats, 3 Republicans and one independent voted "no."

Earlier in the day, Mr. Bush applauded the Democrat-led Congress for dropping "arbitrary timetables for withdrawal" and shaving off $4 billion in pork-barrel spending that Democrats put in an earlier war bill, although the president said he wanted to trim more of the remaining $17 billion in domestic spending in the legislation.

"By voting for this bill, members of both parties can show our troops, and the Iraqis, and the enemy that our country will support our servicemen and women in harm's way," Mr. Bush said at a Rose Garden press conference.

After the vote, White House spokesman Alex Conant said, "Congress is to be congratulated for successfully providing our troops with the funding and flexibility they need to protect our country, rather than mandating arbitrary timetables for military operations."

Mr. Bush, who earlier this month vetoed a war bill with a pullout deadline, could sign the new bill as soon as today, rushing the funds to pay for training and equipment for the troop surge under way in Baghdad.

"The fact is this is simply the best bill we could put together that the president would sign," said House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat. "This is political reality. It is not the bill we wanted."

The massive defections among Democrats -- including a "nay" vote by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California -- underscores the intense pressure they are feeling from the party's powerful anti-war base.

Also, three of the four Democratic senators running for president voted against the bill, which has faced a recent barrage of attacks by former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, who has positioned himself as an outspoken anti-war candidate.

123Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  2. EDITORIAL: Holding Holder in contempt
  3. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  4. EDITORIAL: Pocket money for politicians
  5. PRUDEN: 'Tis better to kill the health care corpse now
More Top Stories »
  1. LAMBRO: Roberts for the defense
  2. Female coach takes over Coolidge football
  3. Texas adopts conservative curriculum
  4. Utah lawmaker resigns in hot-tub incident
  5. KUHNER: A gangster regime

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  2. Texas adopts conservative curriculum
  3. Pelosi confident House will pass health care
  4. Dems: 'Won't be long' for health care
  5. Utah lawmaker resigns in hot-tub incident
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Holding Holder in contempt
  2. Sen. Brown bashes 'bitter' health push
  3. Prius case leaves questions hanging
  4. Hillary Clinton rebukes Israel
  5. LAMBRO: Roberts for the defense

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Dems still scraping for health reform votes

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.