The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Opinion > Commentary

ZUMWALT: North Korea's 'grail' quest

By James Zumwalt | Wednesday, September 17, 2008

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

COMMENTARY:

When the only leader the North Korean people had ever known - Kim Il-sung - died in July 1994, they had been prepared for years for the tyrant's son, Kim Jong-il, to accede to power.

While no other communist country had made the transition of power from father to son, the propaganda effort to prepare North Koreans for this evolution was carefully planned. Having taken the reins of power in 1948, the father's cult figure persona was force-fed to the people. Thus, Kim Il-sung's wishes became the people's will - and Kim Il-Sung's wish, made clear in the 1970s, was for his son to succeed him.

Among other efforts to engrain acceptance by the people for a single family's birth right to control a nation, photographs of the son were posted in buildings directly alongside those of the father. The father was known as "the Great Leader" and, obviously, since there can only be one such leader in a dictatorship, his son was dubbed "the Dear Leader."

Immediately after the father's sudden passing, a "Holy Grail" of authority mysteriously "appeared" - a document by which the father, allegedly before his death (but doubtfully so), had quietly transferred various powers to his son.

It was against this backdrop then, during a December 1994 trip to Pyongyang, I asked a senior level North Korean official what steps were being taken to prepare the people for a transition of power in the event of the sudden demise of Kim Jong-il. In typical fashion in a country where an official's political and physical life could end prematurely for saying the wrong things, this official simply responded Kim Jong-il's health was fine so the succession matter was a non-issue. Even at that time, however, U.S. intelligence knew Kim Jong-il, only 52 when his father died, had some health issues. And, in the 14 years since, Kim Jong-il has done nothing to prepare his people for a future power transfer.

Various media reports now surmise, due to Kim Jong-il's absence from recent public appearances, he has suffered a stroke. While this is not the first time the playboy dictator's low public profile has generated such speculation, this time it may be true. (Chinese military doctors attending him report he is experiencing convulsions.) If so, this event could not occur at a worse time.

The United States and North Korea had worked out an agreement, or at least U.S. officials believed so, to stop Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program. It is now understood part of that agreement was unwritten, thus generating contrary views (a ploy Pyongyang uses even when agreements are written). Thus, we have a situation in which the North is awaiting its removal from the U.S. State Department's terrorist list as a condition precedent while we wait, before doing so, for the North first to fully disclose all its nuclear programs. How, or even whether, this issue is resolved will be telling as to who is in control in Pyongyang.

To date, it appears North Korea's position on this issue has not changed from that last promulgated by Kim Jong-il. This strongly suggests one of two possibilities.

One possibility is Kim Jong-il, currently incapacitated, will return. Thus, no Pyongyang official dares cross the line to espouse a position contrary to his as that official may rue the day he did so after the recovering despot returns to power. Independent leadership traits are not viewed fondly in the North - even when just perceived as such by outside sources.

In 1998, a young North Korean economic minister, noted in the Western press for his leadership qualities, was executed - ostensibly for corruption - after being touted as a potential successor to the older Kim Jong-il.

Another possibility is that Kim Jong-il's condition is more serious and potential rivals are "jockeying" for position - with no single rival yet emerging. There are three groups from which that rival will come - the military, the party or the Kim Jong-il family (i.e., one of his three sons). Contrary to his own father's promotion of his son to accede to power, Kim Jong-il has done nothing to promote his own sons. And, had his own father not promoted Kim Jong-il's succession, there would have been an equal chance for a successor to emerge from among either of the two remaining groups as the father always kept the army and the party power bases in balance. Not so for Kim Jong-il.

Feeling disrespected by the party after his father's death, Kim Jong-il strongly came to favor the military, from which power base his replacement would most likely come.

With Kim Jong-il's favoritism of the military leaving it with more generals than ever before, there may be a bit of a logjam for a top rival to emerge. But, when he does, we should bank on the fact his emergence will be tenuous if he shows any signs of weakness in knuckling under to U.S. pressure concerning Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program.

Thus, the loss of Kim Jong-il will do little to improve conditions for a verifiable nuclear-free North Korea.

One certainty about North Korea's leadership succession is that only after the winning rival emerges will the "Holy Grail" document by which Kim Jong-il quietly bestows authority upon that successor once again "appear."

James G. Zumwalt, a Marine veteran of the Persian Gulf and Vietnam wars, is a contributor to The Washington Times.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  2. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  3. CIA chief urged to 'correct' record
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate

Most Shared

  1. EXCLUSIVE: Career diplomats protest Obama appointments
  2. GOP hits Pelosi for mouse funds
  3. PRUDEN: Ministry of Apology would cure all ills
  4. Obama agenda stalls on Capitol Hill
  5. EDITORIAL: Killing Cap & Trade
  6. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  7. YON: Girl with no future
  8. EDITORIAL: Stonewalling on Walpin-gate
  9. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's secret files
  10. Pelosi's mouse slated for $30M slice of cheese

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.