


OPINION/ANALYSIS
The White House views the speech in Cairo by President Obama reaching out to Muslims as part of its aggressive effort to counter the lies of Muslim extremists while promoting American values around the world.
Specialists in international public diplomacy, however, said the president missed a chance to launch a much-needed program to more directly critique the roots of Muslim extremism and counter its ideology of hate with a war of ideas.
Denis McDonough, White House deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, said the Cairo speech June 4 built on Mr. Obama’s August 2007 call for a new “comprehensive strategy” aimed at drying up terrorists’ base of support.
The strategy is focused on countering terrorist “lies” about the United States, he said, and to “tell the real story about the country, our interests, about the way we carry out those interests and the way we’ll defend the country against threats.”
“It’s not the opening salvo [in a war of ideas], it’s the latest step in an aggressive effort to counter the lies that the extremists tell about the United States,” Mr. McDonough said in an interview.
Asked about critics who say the speech was long on rhetoric and short on policy prescriptions, Mr. McDonough said the administration’s ideological counterterrorism effort is being worked out and will include new policies at several government agencies. The soft-power emphasis also remains a high priority of Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, he said.
Mr. McDonough said the newly created National Security Council directorate for global engagement, while not an operational arm, will seek to “synchronize” U.S. government efforts to counter terrorist ideas.
James Glassman, who left government in January as undersecretary of state for public diplomacy, said the Obama speech fell short by failing to offer a new strategic direction.
Mr. Glassman said the problem is the president continued the ineffective line of reasoning that the best way to counter the false notion that the U.S. is out to destroy Islam is by promoting the “to know us is to love us” theme.
“That doesn’t get you anywhere,” Mr. Glassman said. “Nobody wants to listen to that. It’s much better to develop a counternarrative that states that what this is all about is that there is a conflict going on in Muslim societies that deeply affects us, but [that it] is an intra-Muslim conflict. We need to say that even though it may not be politically correct.”
Mr. Glassman said Mr. Obama’s presence at the Cairo university was significant in itself because the president “is a great symbol of America at its best. But at some point they’ve got to take the next step.”
The Obama speech was carefully worded to appeal to Muslim sympathies by noting current tensions between Muslims and the U.S. and seeking to bridge differences.
Mr. Obama used his middle name, Hussein, which was considered politically off-limits during last year’s presidential campaign. And he stated incorrectly that there are 7 million Muslims in the United States when most estimates put the figure at 3 million or less.
The president also focused attention on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that many in the State Department bureaucracy and U.S. foreign policy establishment regard as the key to solving the ideological problem.
View Entire Story
Bill Gertz is a national security columnist for The Washington Times and senior editor at The Washington Free Beacon (www.freebeacon.com). He has been with The Times since 1985.
He is the author of six books, four of them national best-sellers. His latest book, “The Failure Factory,” on government bureaucracy and national security, was published in September 2008.
Mr. ...
By Robert F. Turner
We need to remember the war the way it really happened
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

The “Silver Tsunami” created by aging Baby Boomers is hitting America. Let’s explore how we adjust to it, enjoy it and defy negative expectations about age.