Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

‘Tough fighting’ in Afghanistan, not for Petraeus confirmation

Senate panel approves nomination

GLASS HALF FULL: Optimism is high that Army Gen. David H. Petraeus will be confirmed in the next few days as commander of allied forces in Afghanistan. (Associated Press)GLASS HALF FULL: Optimism is high that ArmyGen. David H. Petraeus will be confirmed in the next few days as commander of allied forces in Afghanistan. (Associated Press)

Predicting “tough fighting” ahead, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus vowed to review rules of engagement to ensure U.S. troops aren’t handicapped on the battlefield and left open the prospect of delaying troop withdrawals as he breezed through Senate confirmation hearings as President Obama’s nominee to lead the war in Afghanistan.

Less than a week after Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal resigned after making disparaging remarks about his civilian bosses, the Senate Armed Services Committee approved Gen. Petraeus to replace him as commander of U.S. and allied forces in Afghanistan. The full Senate likely will confirm Gen. Petraeus in coming days.

In his opening testimony, the four-star general said that “protecting the [Afghan] population inevitably requires killing, capturing or turning the insurgents.” But he also pledged to continue what he called the “emphasis on reducing the loss of innocent civilian life to an absolute minimum in the course of military operations.”

Some U.S. forces in Afghanistan have complained that the rules of engagement have left units vulnerable to attack. Gen. Petraeus said he would seek a balance between minimizing casualties and protecting soldiers in the battlefield.

But he also said that some problems may stem from how the rules of engagement, or the procedures for when U.S. soldiers can fire their weapons, are interpreted at the ground level.

In response to a question from Sen. John Thune, South Dakota Republican, Gen. Petraeus said, “First of all, if I could, just to be precise, it’s really about the implementation of the rules of engagement and the tactical directive, both of which I think are fundamentally sound. I think, I don’t see any reason to change them in significant ways.

“Rather, what we do need to do is make sure that the intent behind those, the intent being to reduce the loss of innocent civilian life in the course of military operations to an absolute minimum — that’s an imperative for any counterinsurgents. We must achieve that,” Gen. Petraeus said.

Gen. McChrystal worked closely with Afghan President Hamid Karzai to assure him that U.S forces were working hard to minimize casualties. In the Rolling Stone magazine profile that was the cause for his forced resignation, Gen. McChrystal mused that the military should bestow medals for showing restraint on the field of battle, a medal for not firing one’s weapon.

Gen. Petraeus said he too had been in contact with Mr. Karzai three times in the past week, including a conversation with the Afghan leader on the way to the hearing.

“In fact, in the past few days, I have had a good discussion with [Mr.] Karzai on this topic, noting that, if confirmed, I would continue the emphasis on reducing loss of civilian life in the course of operations to an absolute minimum, while also ensuring that we provide whatever assets are necessary to ensure the safety of [International Security Assistance Forces] and Afghan forces when they are in a tough spot,” he said.

Gen. Petraeus and others in the military pushed hard last fall to continue the Afghanistan war as a counterinsurgency campaign that focused on protecting the Afghan population from the Taliban and other insurgents, while building credible local government institutions and police to eventually provide security for the population once U.S. and NATO forces leave.

During his question and answer session, Gen. Petraeus said he did not recommend setting a withdrawal date of July 2011.

Gen. Petraeus said that the July 2011 date should be interpreted as a period to begin the transition to the local Afghan institutions, not as a drop-dead date to start the exit from Afghanistan.

The only fireworks came when Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, sharply questioned Gen. Petraeus about whether he agreed with White House suggestions that the pullout will occur on schedule, no matter what Afghanistan looks like in a year’s time.

“Somebody needs to get it straight without doubt what the hell we’re going to do in Afghanistan,” Mr. Graham said.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2012 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Related Content
Multimedia
You Might Also Like
  • Republican presidential candidates, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, right, and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum argue a point during a presidential debate Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2012, in Mesa, Ariz. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

    Rivals target Santorum in debate

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** Newt Gingrich (Associated Press)

    Gingrich campaign warned 2nd time for financial dealings

    By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

  • FILE - This May 24, 2010 file photo show the exterior of Solyndra Inc. in Fremont, Calif. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)

    Bonuses given after raises at Solyndra

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Champion's Heart

          A wife, mother of three and world waterskiing champion looks at the world through the eyes of her faith.

          Tango of Mind and Emotion

          Notes for nurturing and understanding mental-emotional health.

          Haydon's Soccer and Sports Pitch

          Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.