- ‘Gay Jeans’ that fade into rainbow-colored denim created
- Divided court strikes down big porn award
- Jimmy Carter: Don’t hurt Russian people with sanctions
- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
- L.A. sheriff admits to testing flyover spy program without notifying residents
WYSONG: Vetoing the veto
Keep debt ceiling a perpetual issue with short extensions
Conventional wisdom holds that President Obama can use the veto to prevent Republicans from dismantling his agenda. Accordingly, we are told we must limit our expectations. But these are not conventional times, and the conventional thinkers are wrong, as usual. Republicans can downsize government, and Mr. Obama will sign the bills to do so.
The Obama administration must go to Congress to increase the debt ceiling. Until now, this act has been viewed as a mere formality, so the bill moves through the House and Senate with little fanfare. Everyone denounces the situation, but no one wants to shut down the government.
Winning the House and whittling the Senate down to 52 Democrats this month did not give the Republicans a victory - only the tools for victory. The debt ceiling is the key to victory.
All spending bills must originate in the House of Representatives. If the House would not increase the debt ceiling year by year, but only month by month, debt would become the perpetual issue. Although it may appear to be inefficient legislatively, this strategy can accomplish the mandate of 2010.
Each month, the House could agree to increase the debt ceiling if - and only if - one key program were reduced or eliminated to offset the overspending. Just one sacred cow, and the less popular it is, the better.
Finally, debt and spending would be bound together in one conversation.
If House Democrats and Republicans in name only block such a bill, it paints targets on their backs for the 2012 elections. If they cannot block the bill, it goes to the Senate, where the scenario is repeated.
Twenty-three Democratic senators must wage re-election campaigns in 2012, and after this year’s elections, few of them are sleeping well. They would have to choose between the shutdown and a single special-interest group.
If they choose to shut down the government, that simply enlarges the pulpit and publicizes the debate over debt and spending. If conservatives cannot win that argument, there is no hope they can save this great nation.
If Mr. Obama chooses to veto, he must justify shutting down the entire government to save one program. It would not affect all of the nation’s entitlement junkies but only a small percentage of them. This puts the relatively few affected in direct conflict with the vast majority who are unaffected and do not want their benefits interrupted.
If a vetoed bill is returned to Congress, there remains a substantial chance that endangered Democrats would vote to override the veto. If Democrats were to shut down the government to save a single, unpopular program, they would look like idiots.
Democratic arguments would grow more wearisome and less effective with each monthly battle, while the Republican position would be strengthened. By tying debt to spending cuts, Republicans make good policy and good politics at the same time.
Ronald Reagan famously said, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.” But this strategy of monthly program cuts could terminate many wasteful government programs.
If Mr. Obama’s veto is overridden, it must be a bipartisan override, in which case, Mr. Obama becomes a marginalized figure and a lame duck. Knowing this, he would be very reluctant to risk his presidency. Public opinion would never support shutting down the government for a single unpopular program.
For Republicans, the most difficult part of this strategy would be choosing the programs. Like mosquitos at a nudist colony, they have an abundance of tempting targets.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
Get Breaking Alerts
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Kansas will nullify local regulation of guns
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Washington Redskins' 2014 schedule opens with Texans
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
- Harry Reid using tax dollars to fight Koch brothers, La. GOP chair charges