- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
Welfare reform law faces revision at 15
Safety net again under scrutiny on Hill
Don’t expect much hoopla or cake-cutting as the landmark welfare reform law passed by President Clinton and congressional Republicans in the mid-1990s celebrates its 15th anniversary Monday.
Even though the widely touted overhaul of the national safety net for the poor and unemployed has touched the lives of virtually every American family, the Obama administration and Congress are debating new changes to the system, and a temporary extension of the main welfare programs is likely again with another funding deadline looming Sept. 30.
But another round of welfare reform is not being ignored on Capitol Hill.
Both the House and Senate have had committee hearings, and in March, a group of House Republicans introduced a bill to begin “managing” welfare by requiring a public accounting of the costs of 70-plus federal anti-poverty programs.
Ineffective, redundant and obsolete programs will be targeted for cost savings or elimination, House Republican aides say.
By contrast, a group of House Democrats, led by Rep. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, have introduced their own version of the bill, also designed to overhaul several federal welfare programs. Government has too many barriers to “healthy relationships and healthy marriages,” cooperative parenting and “sustainable employment,” said Mr. Davis.
The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act touched virtually all U.S. households, addressing a system of welfare for the poor that even many supporters acknowledged was in serious disrepair.
Besides establishing a cash-welfare program with time limits and work rules, the law funded child care, child-support enforcement, child welfare, community block grants, energy assistance, nutrition, adoption, responsible fatherhood, teen-pregnancy prevention and abstinence education. Marriage education was added later.
Congress last approved a reauthorization in 2005, wrapping the move in a larger budget reconciliation bill, and must authorize further funding under that law by Sept. 30.
When the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program went into effect, 12.3 million people and 4.4 million families received welfare checks. With an emphasis on work and ending a culture of dependence of federal handouts, U.S. welfare rolls soon plummeted, declining even through the 2000-2002 recession.
But the Great Recession that began in 2008 forced many American families to turn again to welfare. Today, TANF rolls are about 18 percent higher, with 4.4 million recipients and 1.8 million families in 2010.
The 1996 reform had many notable outcomes: higher employment for low-income mothers; higher collection rates for child-support payments; new “welfare-to-work” programs in states; and, at least until the 2007 recession, a sustained drop in child-poverty rates.
However, critics of welfare reform argue that many of the changes in the 1996 law were misguided and should be reversed.
TANF’s reforms have “shredded the safety net,” said Legal Momentum, a women’s legal defense and advocacy group.
Only two-fifths of eligible families and one-fifth of poor children are enrolled in TANF, and many people, including legal immigrants, are “arbitrarily” excluded, the group said. Also, TANF checks are inadequate in the current struggling economy, the work rules discourage education, child care is underfunded, and there aren’t enough government-subsidized jobs.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Stricter standards force abortion clinics to close; pro-lifers cheer shrinking numbers
- Public accommodations provision in Md. transgender rights bill draws outcry
- German home-school family can stay in U.S. indefinitely
- U.S. Supreme Court declines German home-school case
- Medical facility 'buffer-zone' law in court
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
- Inside the Beltway: A new interest in Rahm Emanuel for 2016?
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- Liam Neeson tells NYC mayor to 'man up' in horse carriage fight
- Brennan: Russia 'absolutely' could invade eastern Ukraine
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again