- Arkansas voter ID law struck down by state judge
- FDA proposes ban on e-cigarette sales to minors
- Bad omen? Italian man crushed to death by John Paul II crucifix
- Company stopped from accepting abortion waste
- Girl surprises Michelle Obama with unemployed dad’s resume
- ‘Harry Potter’ religion class seeks to enlighten students on ‘God, sin, and theodicy’
- ‘Optionally piloted’ Black Hawk helicopter clears tests; future missions to go ‘fully unmanned’
- Vice News reporter kidnapped in Ukraine is freed after being beaten, blindfolded
- FCC’s new ‘net neutrality’ proposal sparks outrage among consumer advocates
- Families of ferry’s lost confront South Korean officials
Top-secret clearance checks falsified
Time, money now spent to probe fraud
Federal authorities responsible for granting security clearances to government employees and contractors are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars investigating the investigators.
Government inspectors say they have undertaken a broader campaign in recent years to root out fraud in background checks as more national security clearances are being sought than ever before.
Overall, court records reviewed by The Washington Times show at least 170 confirmed falsifications of interviews or record checks and more than 1,000 others that couldn’t be verified. The background investigators, whose work helps determine who gets top-secret security clearance, were submitting forms saying they conducted interviews or verified official documents when they never did.
“The monetary loss sustained by the government does not, nor cannot, represent the cost associated with potential compromise of our nation’s security and the trust of the American people in its government’s workforce,” Kathy L. Dillaman, associate director in charge of investigations at the Office of Personnel Management, wrote in a victim-impact statement for a recent court case involving a convicted investigator.
Douglas Shontz, a national security researcher at the Rand Corp. who had conducted back ground checks at the Defense Department, said background investigations used to be the purview of retired FBI agents and police detectives. That has changed as more and more contractors and employees require security clearances. Many of the background checks are now outsourced.
“You have a huge push to get people in the door,” he said.
Mr. Shontz said that, in general, background interviews with neighbors, former employers, associates and others help determine whether someone could be more vulnerable to taking bribes or likely to talk too freely about sensitive government information.
“They can highlight potential issues for follow-up,” he said.
The OPM’s office of inspector general has an initiative “focused on fabrication cases involving OPM Federal Investigative Services background investigators,” said Michelle Schmitz, assistant inspector general for investigations.
During the past three years, court records show, seven investigators and two records checkers have been convicted of federal crimes in Washington involving falsification of records. There is no indication in any of the cases that the people who got the security clearances eventually were determined to be unsuitable.
Still, investigators were forced to reopen old cases, and one falsified interview or document check can raise doubts about entire investigations.
“In addition to the potential damage to OPM’s reputation as the primary provider of federal background investigations, the cost of investigating and correcting the case is substantial both in time and money,” Ms. Dillaman wrote in a victim-impact statement for a recent court case.
Those convicted of lying about background checks have faced sentences ranging from probation to more than two years in federal prison, court records show.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington this month announced a 90-day prison sentence given to a former government background investigator, Thomas Fitzgerald, for falsifying information in more than two dozen investigative reports from March 2005 to May 2006. He was ordered to pay more than $100,000 to OPM’s investigative services branch for the cost of reopening numerous investigations that were assigned to him.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Jim McElhatton is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Consumer protection board under fire for suspected violations of Hatch act
- Government watchdog mismanages its own funds
- Transparency's end: Sen. Richard Blumenthal fights subpoena of own records in union case
- GSA IG helped recover Depression-era masterworks
- HHS nominee Sylvia Burwell entangled in MetLife lawsuit
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Only IRS employees could expect rewards for failing to pay their taxes
- Holder cancels appearance in OKC amid angry protests
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- Sold out: Ukraine's leadership swapped best military weapons for cash
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Gun control supporters send message to NRA
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Nevada rancher's racial remarks cost him range of support
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014