- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
EDITORIAL: Obamacare on life support
White House attempts to stall Supreme Court consideration
The Obama administration this week tried to buy time for its legal defense of its health care takeover legislation. This move merely delays the inevitable, as everyone knows the Supreme Court will decide the ultimate fate of Obamacare. Virginia Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli simply wants to skip the irrelevant step of waiting for the case to wind its way through the court of appeals.
Two federal district judges already ruled the individual mandate unconstitutional, and Mr. Cuccinelli believes it makes no sense for states and businesses to waste time and money implementing a law that the Supreme Court may very well end up throwing out.
The administration responded earlier this week by saying the short-term burdens on Virginia and its consumers wouldn’t be too heavy and that the case should move forward through the ordinary process. It noted that just two weeks earlier it filed a full constitutional argument with the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and begged that this court - thought to be more friendly territory - be allowed to weigh in. The O Force argument boiled down to this: Congress can force people to spend their own money even on a product they don’t want.
According to the brief, “Participating [in the health care market] is essentially universal; the need for medical treatment may arise unexpectedly and not as a matter of choice; the cost of care may overwhelm the typical family budget; and, in many cases, an individual can expect to receive expensive medical services without regard to his ability to pay.”
Mr. Cuccinelli’s argument is that when an individual chooses not to buy health insurance in the first place, there is no “commerce” for Congress to regulate. Congress may regulate commerce that already exists, but it cannot force people to create or participate in commerce to start with. The Constitution’s main purpose is to ensure that the federal government’s powers are limited rather than universal.
The transparent stalling tactic has an air of desperation to it. A Rasmussen Reports poll released Monday showed 62 percent of likely voters supported repeal of the health care law - nearly the highest level of opposition since the unconstitutional law was enacted. It’s likely the high court will serve as the death panel for Obamacare.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- EDITORIAL: Republicans finally fight back vs. phony 'war on women'
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Recent Brandeis choices disgraceful
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: A Carson 'apology' to Obama
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws