- The Washington Times - Tuesday, May 31, 2011


Oh, how they dream: The mainstream news media seeks to foment discord between Sarah Palin and Rep. Michele Bachmann, should the former Alaska governor and Minnesota Republican both run for the White House. Imagine. The obsessed press perhaps envisions a cat fight between the politicians they bill as tea party “darlings,” their coverage a veritable showcase for tacky prose, snide commentary and unchecked speculation.

What if they were both liberal Democrats? Awestruck journalists would frame them as Athena-like, or warrior goddesses, anyway. Then again, the same press would be flummoxed and furious if the pair emerged with a presidential ticket reading “Bachman/Palin 2012.” Or vice versa.

Meanwhile, Mrs. Bachmann will have none of it.

“I like Sarah Palin a lot. We’re friends. And I don’t consider her a competitor. I consider her a friend,” she told ABC morning host George Stephanopolous, who already had billed the theoretical match-up as “the epic political showdown” of the election.

“My comparison, ultimately, is to Barack Obama. I created a successful company. I’m a tax litigation attorney. I raised 28 children in my home. I have a number of wide experiences that I bring to the table. And that’s my comparison,” Mrs. Bachmann concluded.

The end result? ABC’s attempt to gin up a brawl was “a dismissive take on two conservative females,” says Newsbusters analyst Scott Whitlock.


He’s lingered over a presidential run for 19 months. His name often doesn’t even make the public recognition polls. He’s already made 16 trips to New Hampshire, 15 trips to South Carolina and 14 trips to Iowa. But Rick Santorum is in. A campaign spokeswoman confirms he’ll announce his White House bid next Monday morning, at the Somerset County Courthouse in the coal mining country of southwestern Pennsylvania

“Polls don’t mean anything. What matters is getting out there,” the former Pennsylvania lawmaker told Fox News Tuesday.


“Anthony Weiner is exactly the kind of Democrat who would sensationalize a story like this if the politician involved was a Republican. And you can be sure the press wouldnt have to be dragged kicking and screaming to cover it,” says National Review contributor Jonah Goldberg, regarding the New York lawmaker’s efforts to prove he did not Tweet a lewd image of men’s underwear to a young woman.

“I dont think this is a colossal scandal, but the selective standards of the mainstream media drive me crazy. Recall that the New York District 26 race weve just finished analyzing was a result of the fact that a sitting congressman had to resign because he sent a picture of himself without shirt to a woman on Craigslist. In 2006, Nancy Pelosi used Mark Foley’s scandal to help win back the Congress,” Mr. Goldberg continues.

“And what if Weiner’s innocent and this is a dirty trick by some right-wingers? Dont we need to know that? Shouldnt they be exposed?…At minimum, it seems to me that if the Left wants to claim Weiner was set up, then they are honor bound to support a full investigation,” he concludes.


Story Continues →