- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Mine workers union holds off giving its endorsement to Obama
Question of the Day
The nation’s largest coal miners union has yet to make an endorsement for the upcoming presidential election after giving President Obama its full and early support four years ago — hinting it may sit out the race.
But despite the United Mine Workers of America’s indecision, organized labor is throwing its support to Mr. Obama much as it did in 2008 when the then-Democratic senator from Illinois won the presidency.
The UMWA says it will make an endorsement — or not — based on recommendations of its state councils, most of which will hold meetings in the next few weeks. The process likely will conclude by mid-September, said UMWA Communications Director Phil Smith.
The UMWA has a history of backing Democratic presidential candidates, but “it’s certainly an option that there could be no endorsement” this year, the spokesman said.
In contrast, the nation’s largest teachers union — the National Education Association — couldn’t wait to back President Obama’s re-election bid, overwhelmingly endorsing the Democrat more than 13 months ago. The union has applauded Mr. Obama for making “critical investments” to the nation through the 2009 economic stimulus package, his health care reform law a year later and his support of legislation to spend millions of dollars to avert teacher layoffs.
The president, in a nod to receiving such enthusiastic support, addressed the NEA’s annual summer gathering in early July via teleconference, saying he was running for a second term “to make sure every American has a chance to get a great education.”
NEA President Dennis Van Roekel, in response to Mr. Obama’s comments, said the union “believe(s) in you and we are behind you all the way.”
Several other major unions endorsed the president’s re-election bid last year — well before Mr. Romney emerged as the presumptive GOP nominee. The list includes the Service Employees International Union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association.
The president also predictably received official backing from the AFL-CIO — the nation’s largest labor federation — as well as the Teamsters, the United Steelworkers, the International Association of Fire Fighters and the National Association of Police Organizations, among others.
Despite the UMWA’s cautious endorsement approach, it’s unlikely the union will back Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney.
“I’m not seeing any great groundswell of support for either candidate,” Mr. Smith said. “At the same time, we are a union, and Mr. Romney and especially now [his running mate Paul] Ryan are not exactly known as friends of unions.”
The miners union is upset over Environmental Protection Agency regulations aimed at the coal industry, particularly the administration’s support for tougher emissions standards for coal-fueled utility plants. Such policies mean fewer coal-run plants — and jobs — in the future, the union says.
“Our members aren’t stupid … they see what this means,” Mr. Smith said.
Another issue that Mr. Obama has clashed with some unions over is the proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would bring oil from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada, to Texas. Backers of the project said it would create thousands of jobs.
The Laborers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA), which supports the project, blasted the Obama administration for its decision in January to deny an application by Canadian firm TransCanada to build the controversial pipeline, calling it “politics at its worst.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- N.J. Gov. Christie picks state A.G. to fill U.S. Senate seat
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Pentagon running out of time to find mass of missing weapons in Afghanistan
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring 'God's Rescue Squad'
- WEST: Those who would rather join the jihadi army than their own nation's army
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq