- Obama to Central American leaders: I need help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
EDITORIAL: Swift-boating Obama
Veterans target the leaker-in-chief
Question of the Day
President Obama is brushing off criticism from the Special Operations community over politicized national-security leaks and his exaggerated role in the Osama bin Laden takedown. Two new organizations — the Special Operations OPSEC Education Fund and Special Operations Speaks — have launched campaigns to highlight the president’s exploitation of the military for political gain.
“I don’t take these folks too seriously,” Mr. Obama said on Monday, but the criticism must be hitting a raw nerve. The Obama campaign quickly put up a webpage devoted to discrediting the groups. The site labels the special operators’ effort “Swift Boat 2.0,” referring to the effort by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth (SBVT) to politicize Sen. John Kerry’s war record during the 2004 election. Among liberals, the slang term “swift-boating” has come to mean a coordinated disinformation campaign.
Today’s complaints are serious. In May, retired Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when the bin Laden mission was executed, admitted he was worried, “a great deal that this time of year that somehow this gets spun into election politics.” The bin Laden raid had been political fodder from the beginning, however. Mr. Obama pledged he wouldn’t “spike the football” but since the killing has been dancing in the end zone.
Over the weekend, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, New Hampshire Democrat, introduced Mr. Obama as the one who “led the mission that brought Osama bin Laden to justice.” Earlier this year, a political ad timed to coincide with the venture’s anniversary questioned whether Republican challenger Mitt Romney would have given the order to kill the terrorist mastermind. This was before recent revelations that Mr. Obama scrapped the operation three times before finally mustering the fortitude to make the “gutsy call.”
Mr. Obama is also vulnerable on the leaks issue, something he flatly denies. “I’ve been criticized by some for being too vigorous in going after folks who leak information that impacts our national security,” he said Monday. That’s not exactly true. Outside the case of Wikileaker Bradley Manning, there’s scant evidence of a push to punish people for leaking sensitive national-security information.
The problem is acute, though. In June, Chairman Dianne Feinstein, a Democratic senator from California, told CNN, “I’ve been on the Intelligence Committee for 11 years and I have never seen it worse.” There have been leaks about drone strikes, U.S. special operations and foreign classified information sent to newspapers, TV and Hollywood screenwriters. The full extent of White House collaboration in a self-glorifying feature film of the bin Laden strike has yet to be revealed, while the Obama administration rejected a bipartisan call from Congress to appoint a special counsel to investigate the leaks.
Mr. Obama may claim he’s not concerned about the criticism he is getting from the Special Operations community, but judging by the frantic response from his campaign, the president is feeling the heat.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Trump-Carson a 2016 dream ticket
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama fundraises as the world burns
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: No U.S. support for Christian peril
- EDITORIAL: Gun-shy Obama
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab