- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
House panel OKs education bills, but hopes dim for big reforms
Question of the Day
On strict party-line votes, a key House panel on Tuesday cleared the final two pieces of the Republican education-reform agenda.
Not a single Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee voted for the bills, part of a larger package to replace the decade-old and widely maligned No Child Left Behind law. While the legislation will likely clear the GOP-led House sometime this year, its prospects in the Democrat-controlled Senate are dim.
The deep partisan divide on display Tuesday, with Democrats charging that the Republican approach would return American education to a pre-civil rights era with little or no oversight from the federal government, makes it unlikely the two sides will reach a compromise in the foreseeable future.
“To my deep disappointment, No Child Left Behind will likely remain the law of the land,” said Rep. George Miller, California Democrat and his party’s ranking member on the committee. “The Republican proposals will take our education system back decades.”
The measures, introduced by committee Chairman Rep. John Kline, Minnesota Republican, aim to roll back federal involvement in education policy, which his party strongly believes is best developed and implemented at the state and local levels.
The “Student Success Act” would eliminate the unpopular “adequate yearly progress” (AYP) benchmark instituted under NCLB, instead calling on states to design their own accountability systems that must be in place within two years of the act becoming law. It also allows states to use some Title 1 dollars for competitive grants, though the awards would have to be used for narrowly defined purposes, including tutoring. Under the bill, some Title 1 money could also be used for school improvement.
The second bill eliminates the “highly qualified teacher” label under NCLB, which many argue places far too much weight on a teacher’s educational background, rather than his or her actual performance in the classroom. It also requires states to develop within three years their own teacher-evaluation systems, which must include assessments of an instructor’s classroom leadership.
“The policies in these bills weren’t drawn up behind closed doors in Washington,” Mr. Kline said. “They come from the ideas, accomplishments and creativity of superintendents, school chiefs, principals and parents around the country.”
The measures immediately came under fire from teachers unions, civil rights organizations and other groups, many of which share Democrats’ fears that minority students, English-language learners and children with disabilities would be put behind a permanent eight ball under the GOP proposals. Their concerns are based on the notion that, without federal mandates, school districts would use Title 1 dollars and other federal funds meant to aid disadvantaged students for other purposes.
The bills “shift funds away from people who need it the most,” said Rep. Rush D. Holt, New Jersey Democrat.
But Republicans argue that increased federal funding, whether it be for low-income and minority students or for other purposes, has done little to boost student achievement and turn around failing schools.
With little hope of comprehensive education legislation this year, the White House has been granting waivers from NCLB to states that develop their own detailed reform plans. Eleven states have already been granted waivers, and about two dozen more were expected to apply by Tuesday’s midnight deadline.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Libya now nation at risk with weak U.S. influence
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- White House adviser on 2016: Rand Paul more viable than Ted Cruz
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- Pentagon running out of time to find mass of missing weapons in Afghanistan
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama family set to buy $4.25M desert home in California: report
- ORTEL: Note to Janet Yellen: The American bubble is popping
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq