Congress won’t let Panetta close bases

Proponents see politics at play

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

Congress is poised to deliver a defeat to the Obama administration on one of its main defense policies in the new budget — base closings.

Both the House and Senate Armed Services committees have produced fiscal 2013 spending bills that deny Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s request to set up a Base Realignment and Closure Commission (BRAC) next year — the sixth since 1988.

Some in defense circles say it is the result of election-year politics and members of Congress will realize next year that they need to heed top Pentagon officials who have testified that they have too much infrastructure and not enough money.

“It is election-year posturing,” said an aerospace executive who monitors BRAC.

Others are not so sure, saying base closings would put thousands of people out of work in a tepid job market.

“I do not think the appetite will go up postelection,” said Steven P. Bucci, a Heritage Foundation military analyst who served as a senior Pentagon official in the George W. Bush administration.

Congress has never shown any appetite for any BRAC because they, Congress, are by design taken out of the process,” he said.

“A BRAC commission does the research, makes the recommendations for closures, and then everyone has to basically ‘eat’ the results. I sound harsh, but Congress sees the protection of jobs and installations in their districts and states to be their duty,” Mr. Bucci said.

With BRAC, Congress stays mostly on the sidelines. It can lobby the commission, but the commission’s closure list can be accepted or rejected only in full.

Cutting troops, not bases

The Republican-led House already has passed the no-BRAC bill crafted by its Armed Services Committee, and the Democrat-led Senate panel has approved unanimously its defense bill omitting base closures.

A conference committee to reconcile the bills will have no pro-BRAC members, thus delaying the base-closing process for at least a year.

Mr. Panetta has said he needs to close bases and small installations to help him achieve $487 billion in congressionally mandated spending cuts over the next 10 years.

The final defense spending bill not only will deny a new BRAC but also likely will include language that prohibits the military from taking unilateral action to close small facilities without prior White House notification to Congress.

A Pentagon spokeswoman declined to comment when asked what options remain, saying the legislative process is not complete.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks