- ‘Queen of Mean’ Leona Helmsley’s former home hits market for $65M
- Florida beach-goers told to beware flesh-eating bacteria in water
- Lundergan Grimes uses ‘war on women’ strategy to attack McConnell
- Rep. Jeff Miller: ‘Ain’t no leash for VA’
- Al Qaeda nets $125M from ransom payoffs from Europe since 2008
- Ohio Gov. John Kasich cruising to re-election: survey
- Landslide hits Indian village; 150 may be trapped
- Albania bank loses $7M in theft; police arrest 2
- Gov. Mike Pence irked as Obama sends illegals to Indiana on sly
- Israel, White House say Obama phone call to demand cease-fire was fake
U.S., Afghan officials work on partnership deal
Question of the Day
Afghanistan’s government wants to control all special operations and night raids currently led by U.S. and NATO forces, but it will not demand that Americans involved in criminal activity be tried in Afghan courts.
U.S. and Afghan officials started negotiations Thursday in Kabul to reach an agreement on the issue of night raids, the last hurdle on the path to a U.S.-Afghan strategic partnership. Afghan President Hamid Karzai said his government is “taking a magnifying glass” to the draft agreement.
NATO officials insist the night raids have disrupted terrorist networks, but Afghans say the raids are culturally insensitive and generate ill will toward the U.S.
Afghan officials, who spoke on background citing the sensitive nature of discussions, said they have not been taken into confidence by the U.S. or NATO forces conducting the night raids.
As a compromise, it has been proposed that judicial warrants be required from Afghan courts for night raids.
Afghan officials want to relegate U.S. and NATO forces to a supporting role, providing logistical assistance in the form of helicopters and intelligence. Afghan forces already have a lead role in about 60 percent of the raids.
Afghan officials also are seeking veto power on the raids if they consider the targets to be low-level terrorists or perceive a high risk of collateral damage.
The meetings in Kabul were “positive and constructive” and will continue Friday, said Janan Mosazai, a spokesman for the Afghan Foreign Ministry.
Earlier this month, U.S. and Afghan officials signed an agreement transferring the U.S. detention facility at Bagram to the control of the Afghan Defense Ministry.
The negotiations are taking place amid deep anger in Afghanistan over recent incidents involving U.S. troops.
Mr. Karzai emphasized the importance of protecting his country’s sovereignty in a speech at the graduation ceremony for the Afghan military academy.
The Afghan president is very concerned about issues regarding sovereignty, said Ahmed Rashid, a prominent Pakistani journalist and author.
“He is very hurt, for example, that the Taliban call him a puppet of the Americans,” Mr. Rashid told an audience at the Brookings Institution.
The Taliban broke off exploratory peace talks with the U.S. last week over a delay by Washington to act on the militants’ demand that five high-value prisoners be released from the U.S. military detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
The Afghan government supports the transfer of the prisoners to Qatar; however, it says the men must not be detained once in Qatar, but only their movements restricted.
“Our position is that if the United States decides to transfer the Afghan detainees in Guantanamo to Qatar so that they can reunite with their families, and if that is what the detainees agree to, which they have, then the Afghan government has no problem with that,” said Mr. Mosazai, the Afghan government spokesman.
The detainees are unlikely to be released this year, said Bruce Riedel, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
“The Afghan Taliban prisoners are held in Guantanamo, which is the toxic dark hole of American foreign policy that no American politician will be able to touch, certainly not in an election year, and find a way to get those five prisoners out,” he said at the Brookings Institution.
Meanwhile, al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in an audio message railed against the Karzai government’s supporters.
“They are more despicable than the infidels,” said al-Zawahiri, who assumed the mantle of al Qaeda’s leader following the death of Osama bin Laden in a U.S. commando raid in Pakistan in May.
Al Qaeda uses the term infidels to describe non-Muslims and foreigners.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ashish Kumar Sen is a reporter covering foreign policy and international developments for The Washington Times.
Prior to joining The Times, Mr. Sen worked for publications in Asia and the Middle East. His work has appeared in a number of publications and online news sites including the British Broadcasting Corp., Asia Times Online and Outlook magazine.
- Boko Haram takes credit for abduction of Nigerian schoolgirls, threatens to sell them
- Al Qaeda core degraded, but 'more aggressive' affiliates still pose threat to U.S.
- Political uncertainty and violence in first Iraqi election since U.S. withdraw
- Egypt judge sentences 683 Islamists to death over Morsi-tied violence
- Doctor's killing in latest Afghanistan attack puts NGOs in crosshairs
TWT Video Picks
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Ohio Gov. John Kasich cruising to re-election: survey
- Obama mum on where illegal immigrant children are sheltered
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of politicizing business
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world