- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
LAMBRO: Seriously, this is a budget?
Both parties scramble for advantage in a new spendthrift deal
Question of the Day
There is little to like in the debt-heavy budget deal that is about to pass Congress. It does not seriously attack billions of dollars in wasteful spending and barely nicks monster deficits that are forecast to grow by more than $6 trillion over the next 10 years.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office crunched the numbers and said the deal would cut the deficits by a mere $85 billion over the next 10 years in the absence of future spending reductions.
About $62 billion of that will roll back a big chunk of the automatic sequestration spending cuts. The remainder, about $23 billion, would be applied to reducing deficits.
That’s a minuscule amount in an annual budget that is now approaching $4 trillion a year in ever-higher spending.
This isn’t a serious budget. It’s an election-cycle deal that sweeps the government’s fiscal troubles under the rug to give voters in the 2014 midterm congressional races the chance to answer this question: Do you want to continue with a divided Congress that prevents our country from getting its fiscal house in order through top-to-bottom spending reductions that shrink the deficits, reduce tax rates and strengthen our economy?
The nation’s debt-ridden mess stems from a politically divided Congress that has lost sight of Thomas Jefferson’s vision of “a wise and frugal” government.
Republicans want to make sensible but deeper budget cuts and needed reforms in discretionary and entitlement spending, while reducing tax rates to unlock new business investments that foster job growth and boost tax revenues that will also shrink the deficit. Democrats like the spending levels we’ve got now, and are working hard to raise them by creating a sea of new programs, agencies and entitlements such as Obamacare. They don’t want to cut tax rates — they want to raise them, even in a lumbering, job-starved economy.
The compromise was hammered out by Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington and Republican Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin with one political goal in mind: Fashion a budget that cannot only win the approval of the GOP-run House and the Democrat-controlled Senate, but also get past a very liberal, Democratic president who never met a spending bill he didn’t like.
A budget that tries to achieve that is, by definition, a piece of legislation that will satisfy no one. That’s what lawmakers will vote on before leaving for the Christmas holiday.
There are some good things here and there in this bill to applaud. The Pentagon, hit hard by sequestration budget cuts, will get $2 billion more than last year.
It will curb taxpayer contributions to federal employee pensions, asking new government workers after Jan. 1 to pay more into their retirement accounts. Businesses will pay higher premiums for federal pension insurance, and security fees will rise for the airlines and their passengers.
This was not the grand bargain that House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, had sought in the past and that Mr. Ryan wants to eventually achieve. For the Republican leadership, this is all about keeping the government financed and running — putting this year’s damaging federal shutdown behind them — as they head toward the start of a critical election year.
The disastrous Obamacare rollout, a lengthening list of other health care problems it has spawned and an economy still in recovery have hurt the Democrats a great deal more. The shutdown was of brief duration and will gradually recede in most voters’ minds. Obamacare, though, will impose higher medical care costs on providers, increased health insurance premiums, and canceled policies for as long as it is the law of the land.
Meantime, the compromise budget that appears to be headed for approval is stirring bitter opposition among the GOP’s conservative base and spawning a number of party primary challenges in next year’s races.
“This proposal swaps debt reduction today and next year for the dubious promise of debt reduction a decade from now,” said former Rep. Chris Chocola, who heads the Club for Growth, which has a record of defeating GOP incumbents in primaries. “Apparently, there are some Republicans who don’t have the stomach for even relatively small spending reductions that are devoid of budgetary smoke and mirrors,” Mr. Chocola said.
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
Get Breaking Alerts
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Pentagon running out of time to find mass of missing weapons in Afghanistan
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- The List: Top 20 TV medical shows
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?