- The Washington Times - Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Top Democrats pushed back Tuesday against a federal judge’s ruling that the NSA’s phone-records collection program violates privacy rights, asking for higher courts to quickly get involved and bring legal certainty to the murky world of intelligence gathering.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat and chairwoman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said Judge Richard J. Leon’s decision, released Monday, contradicts a secret intelligence court that has upheld the National Security Agency’s phone program 35 times, and contradicts a federal court in California that said the program doesn’t infringe on privacy.

“There are differing opinions now. That’s the state of play. And the assumption is that it’s going to be appealed and the Supreme Court will eventually make a decision, which is really the appropriate thing,” Mrs. Feinstein said.

But she also said part of the problem is that the administration has been operating the programs on the basis of secret legal memos that it refuses to turn over to Congress, making it difficult for even the lawmakers specifically cleared to oversee the intelligence community to know what is occurring.

Indeed, lack of transparency has become a major issue in the debate over surveillance techniques.

The existence of the NSA’s phone-snooping program and other operations came to light only after former government contractor Edward Snowden leaked details to the press.

PHOTOS: President Obama's favorite footstool: The famous Resolute desk

Since then, the intelligence community has declassified documents showing it abused the program and even misled the secret court that was designed to approve operations. Still, the judges always signed off on the operations after accepting the government’s argument that the programs were vital to national security.

On Monday, Judge Leon became the first judge to rule against the NSA program, saying that gathering and storing the data likely violates Americans’ privacy rights. He said technology has moved well beyond where it was in the 1970s, when the Supreme Court upheld data-gathering in its Smith v. Maryland ruling.

Judge Leon ordered the NSA to stop collecting information on two plaintiffs in the case before him, though he stayed his own order to give the Obama administration a chance to appeal.

Many members of Congress applauded Judge Leon’s ruling, saying it highlighted an area where the government has overreached.

But Mrs. Feinstein and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, said Judge Leon’s decision is an outlier.

The White House was mostly mum, but President Obama’s nominee to be the next top attorney at the CIA, Caroline Krass, said she also disagreed with Judge Leon.

“I have a different view about the Fourth Amendment. I think that under Smith versus Maryland, which I still consider to be good law, there is not a reasonable expectation of privacy in telephony metadata,” she said.

Mr. Obama, desperately seeking to preserve the NSA program, met with executives of technology companies Tuesday in an effort to answer their pleas that he rein in excessive data collection.

After a nearly 2-hour meeting with Mr. Obama, a coalition of more than a dozen technology firms — including Google, Yahoo, Apple, Twitter, Facebook and Microsoft — said the administration must reform its data-gathering programs.

Story Continues →